<p>The Supreme Court has taken exception to a judgement delivered by a sessions court in Chhattisgarh in which the rape victim’s name was mentioned and said that all subordinate courts should be careful while dealing with such matters.</p>.<p>A bench headed by Justice Ashok Bhushan said it is well established that in such cases, the name of victim is not to be mentioned in any proceeding.</p>.<p>“However, we take exception to the judgment of the sessions judge where the name of victim is mentioned,” said the bench, also comprising Justices Vineet Saran and M R Shah.</p>.<p>“We are of the view that all the subordinate courts shall be careful in future while dealing with such cases,” the bench said in its June 30 order.</p>.<p>The apex court said this in the order by which it rejected the plea filed by a convict who was challenging the Chhattisgarh High Court verdict dismissing his appeal against conviction in a rape case.</p>.<p>“In the facts of the case, we are not inclined to entertain this special leave petition. The special leave petition is accordingly dismissed,” the bench said.</p>.<p>The high court, in its December 2019 judgement, had dismissed the convict’s plea against a trial court verdict awarding him 10 years jail after holding him guilty in the case.</p>.<p>The sessions court in Mahasamund had convicted the man in the case lodged in 2001.</p>.<p>The high court had upheld the trial court’s order saying the victim’s statement inspired confidence and as per the evidence, it cannot be said to be a case of consensual physical relation.</p>.<p>The apex court, in a verdict delivered in December 2018, had said that name and identity of victims of rape and sexual assault, including those who have died, cannot be disclosed "even in a remote manner".</p>
<p>The Supreme Court has taken exception to a judgement delivered by a sessions court in Chhattisgarh in which the rape victim’s name was mentioned and said that all subordinate courts should be careful while dealing with such matters.</p>.<p>A bench headed by Justice Ashok Bhushan said it is well established that in such cases, the name of victim is not to be mentioned in any proceeding.</p>.<p>“However, we take exception to the judgment of the sessions judge where the name of victim is mentioned,” said the bench, also comprising Justices Vineet Saran and M R Shah.</p>.<p>“We are of the view that all the subordinate courts shall be careful in future while dealing with such cases,” the bench said in its June 30 order.</p>.<p>The apex court said this in the order by which it rejected the plea filed by a convict who was challenging the Chhattisgarh High Court verdict dismissing his appeal against conviction in a rape case.</p>.<p>“In the facts of the case, we are not inclined to entertain this special leave petition. The special leave petition is accordingly dismissed,” the bench said.</p>.<p>The high court, in its December 2019 judgement, had dismissed the convict’s plea against a trial court verdict awarding him 10 years jail after holding him guilty in the case.</p>.<p>The sessions court in Mahasamund had convicted the man in the case lodged in 2001.</p>.<p>The high court had upheld the trial court’s order saying the victim’s statement inspired confidence and as per the evidence, it cannot be said to be a case of consensual physical relation.</p>.<p>The apex court, in a verdict delivered in December 2018, had said that name and identity of victims of rape and sexual assault, including those who have died, cannot be disclosed "even in a remote manner".</p>