<p>Farmers worldwide receive barely a quarter of what consumers spend at the grocery store, and even less for food consumed outside the home, researchers reported Monday.</p>.<p>Beyond the question of whether farmers get their fair share, the multi-step processing from farm to table may not be compatible with sustainable development, according to a study in the journal Nature Food.</p>.<p>"People do not recognise how much of what we pay for in our meals is not the physical food," Cornell University's Chris Barrett, senior author of the study, told <em>AFP</em> by email.</p>.<p>"Most of the value addition in the global food economy is not on farm but rather is the processing, manufacturing, distribution and service activities closer to the consumer."</p>.<p>This highly segmented value chain creates employment and provides convenience for the consumer, whether in the form of bagged salads, frozen dinners or a meal at the mall.</p>.<p>But these consumer advantages should also be measured against the impact on health and the environment, the authors argue.</p>.<p>"Greenhouse gas emissions is a good example," said Barrett, pointing to the carbon pollution generated by all the steps in the value chain. "So is water use."</p>.<p>"There is also the question of where desirable attributes of foods -- such as minerals, vitamins, fibre -- and undesirable attributes ('bad' fats, salt, sugar) are added or lost," he added.</p>.<p>"These are all factors that have major public health implications."</p>.<p>Building on a method originally applied to the US, the researchers developed a standardised approach to estimate the importance of food value chains between farmers and consumers.</p>.<p>They applied this yardstick to data from 2005 to 2015 on 61 middle- and high-income countries that cover 90 percent of the global food economy.</p>.<p>They found that, on average, farmers receive 27 percent of what is paid for foods consumers eat at home.</p>.<p>The study focused on the three-quarters of food that is consumed in the same country where it is produced.</p>.<p>For the other 25 percent, "the farmer share of consumer expenditures on imported foods is almost surely even less," said Barret.</p>.<p>The already vast proportion of food dollars going to post-farm activities is only likely to increase, the study concluded.</p>.<p>Farmers in fast-growing economies like China and India will earn more as their populations get richer, but their share of food spending is likely to shrink as demand for convenient consumption grows.</p>.<p>The study points to the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) -- adopted in 2015 and set for 2030 -- as a way to measure the impact of the vast and growing food value chain sector.</p>.<p>What happens to food between farm and consumer will be critical to many SDGs including those targeting poverty, hunger and "responsible consumption and production".</p>
<p>Farmers worldwide receive barely a quarter of what consumers spend at the grocery store, and even less for food consumed outside the home, researchers reported Monday.</p>.<p>Beyond the question of whether farmers get their fair share, the multi-step processing from farm to table may not be compatible with sustainable development, according to a study in the journal Nature Food.</p>.<p>"People do not recognise how much of what we pay for in our meals is not the physical food," Cornell University's Chris Barrett, senior author of the study, told <em>AFP</em> by email.</p>.<p>"Most of the value addition in the global food economy is not on farm but rather is the processing, manufacturing, distribution and service activities closer to the consumer."</p>.<p>This highly segmented value chain creates employment and provides convenience for the consumer, whether in the form of bagged salads, frozen dinners or a meal at the mall.</p>.<p>But these consumer advantages should also be measured against the impact on health and the environment, the authors argue.</p>.<p>"Greenhouse gas emissions is a good example," said Barrett, pointing to the carbon pollution generated by all the steps in the value chain. "So is water use."</p>.<p>"There is also the question of where desirable attributes of foods -- such as minerals, vitamins, fibre -- and undesirable attributes ('bad' fats, salt, sugar) are added or lost," he added.</p>.<p>"These are all factors that have major public health implications."</p>.<p>Building on a method originally applied to the US, the researchers developed a standardised approach to estimate the importance of food value chains between farmers and consumers.</p>.<p>They applied this yardstick to data from 2005 to 2015 on 61 middle- and high-income countries that cover 90 percent of the global food economy.</p>.<p>They found that, on average, farmers receive 27 percent of what is paid for foods consumers eat at home.</p>.<p>The study focused on the three-quarters of food that is consumed in the same country where it is produced.</p>.<p>For the other 25 percent, "the farmer share of consumer expenditures on imported foods is almost surely even less," said Barret.</p>.<p>The already vast proportion of food dollars going to post-farm activities is only likely to increase, the study concluded.</p>.<p>Farmers in fast-growing economies like China and India will earn more as their populations get richer, but their share of food spending is likely to shrink as demand for convenient consumption grows.</p>.<p>The study points to the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) -- adopted in 2015 and set for 2030 -- as a way to measure the impact of the vast and growing food value chain sector.</p>.<p>What happens to food between farm and consumer will be critical to many SDGs including those targeting poverty, hunger and "responsible consumption and production".</p>