<p>New Delhi: After the rap by the <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/search?q=supreme%20court">Supreme Court</a>, the Uttar Pradesh government on Friday told the apex court that it paid a compensation of Rs five lakh to a man as his release from prison was delayed for a month despite the bail.</p><p>The court had granted bail to a Muslim man on April 29, subsequently, on May 27, he was ordered to be released from prison in Ghaziabad by the trial court.</p><p>As the matter came up on Friday before a bench of Justices K V Viswanathan and N Kotiswar Singh, the government’s counsel submitted that the state had complied with the previous direction and paid the compensation to the petitioner. </p><p>A counsel representing the petitioner also confirmed having received the compensation.</p><p>The man, named Aftab was booked under the provisions of the state’s anti-conversion law. Though he was granted bail by the top court on April 29, he was released from Ghaziabad district jail only on June 24 after a delay of 28 days.</p><p>On June 25, the court severely criticised the jail authorities over the delay. It ordered the state government to pay a Rs five lakh compensation.</p>.SC orders inquiry on not releasing man from jail despite bail.<p>The court had observed that liberty was a “very valuable and precious” right guaranteed under the Constitution. The apex court said the petitioner had lost his liberty for at least 28 days due to a “trivial non-issue”.</p><p>The bench had also ordered an enquiry into the matter by the principal district and sessions judge, Ghaziabad.</p><p>The bench noted that the delay in his release was due to a subsection of a provision of the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021, that was not mentioned in the bail order.</p><p>On April 29, the apex court had granted bail to Aftab, who voluntarily converted to Hinduism and married a Hindu girl according to Hindu rites. The girl’s aunt had lodged a missing person complaint. The man was booked under Section 366 (kidnapping, abducting or inducing a woman to compel her marriage, etc) of the erstwhile IPC and Sections 3 and 5 (Prohibition of conversion from one religion to another religion by misrepresentation, force, fraud, undue influence, coercion, allurement) of the 2021 Act.</p>
<p>New Delhi: After the rap by the <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/search?q=supreme%20court">Supreme Court</a>, the Uttar Pradesh government on Friday told the apex court that it paid a compensation of Rs five lakh to a man as his release from prison was delayed for a month despite the bail.</p><p>The court had granted bail to a Muslim man on April 29, subsequently, on May 27, he was ordered to be released from prison in Ghaziabad by the trial court.</p><p>As the matter came up on Friday before a bench of Justices K V Viswanathan and N Kotiswar Singh, the government’s counsel submitted that the state had complied with the previous direction and paid the compensation to the petitioner. </p><p>A counsel representing the petitioner also confirmed having received the compensation.</p><p>The man, named Aftab was booked under the provisions of the state’s anti-conversion law. Though he was granted bail by the top court on April 29, he was released from Ghaziabad district jail only on June 24 after a delay of 28 days.</p><p>On June 25, the court severely criticised the jail authorities over the delay. It ordered the state government to pay a Rs five lakh compensation.</p>.SC orders inquiry on not releasing man from jail despite bail.<p>The court had observed that liberty was a “very valuable and precious” right guaranteed under the Constitution. The apex court said the petitioner had lost his liberty for at least 28 days due to a “trivial non-issue”.</p><p>The bench had also ordered an enquiry into the matter by the principal district and sessions judge, Ghaziabad.</p><p>The bench noted that the delay in his release was due to a subsection of a provision of the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021, that was not mentioned in the bail order.</p><p>On April 29, the apex court had granted bail to Aftab, who voluntarily converted to Hinduism and married a Hindu girl according to Hindu rites. The girl’s aunt had lodged a missing person complaint. The man was booked under Section 366 (kidnapping, abducting or inducing a woman to compel her marriage, etc) of the erstwhile IPC and Sections 3 and 5 (Prohibition of conversion from one religion to another religion by misrepresentation, force, fraud, undue influence, coercion, allurement) of the 2021 Act.</p>