<p class="title">A federal judge has cleared the way for a defamation trial against Elon Musk over his comments about a British cave rescuer after rejecting key arguments from the Tesla chief.</p>.<p class="bodytext">US judge Stephen Wilson ordered a trial to begin December 3 in Los Angeles in the case that centers on Musk's tweets in a disagreement connected to the rescue of 12 boys from a cave in Thailand in July 2018.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Musk called Vernon Unsworth "pedo guy" after Unsworth, who helped with the rescue, ridiculed Musk's proposal to build a mini-submarine during the crisis as a "PR stunt."</p>.<p class="bodytext">The judge rejected Musk's argument that the term "pedo guy" was a common insult and would be seen as an opinion and not a statement of fact.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Wilson said some of Musk's subsequent statements suggested he believed the charge about Unsworth to be true, which has "created a genuine dispute over the meaning of Defendant's Tweets" that "must be resolved by a jury."</p>.<p class="bodytext">Unsworth has denied being a pedophile.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Wilson accepted aspects of Musk's argument that Unsworth was a "limited public figure" who had voluntarily injected himself into the public debate about how to save the boys.</p>.<p class="bodytext">To win a defamation case in US courts, public figures like celebrities must show actual malice on the part of the person making a false statement, as opposed to the lower standard of negligence.</p>.<p class="bodytext">But Wilson ruled Musk should not be shielded him from a defamation lawsuit because the allegation of pedophilia was not connected to the debate about how to save the boys.</p>.<p class="bodytext">"To allow criticism into every aspect of a plaintiff's life simply because he chose to get involved in a limited issue would render him an all-purpose public figure," Wilson wrote in a decision earlier this week.</p>.<p class="bodytext">"For defendant's comments to relate to Plaintiff's participation in public controversies, there must be some relationship between pedophilia and the rescue or the subs -- there is simply no credible connection here."</p>.<p class="bodytext">Alex Spiro, an attorney representing Musk, said in an email that "we look forward to the trial."</p>
<p class="title">A federal judge has cleared the way for a defamation trial against Elon Musk over his comments about a British cave rescuer after rejecting key arguments from the Tesla chief.</p>.<p class="bodytext">US judge Stephen Wilson ordered a trial to begin December 3 in Los Angeles in the case that centers on Musk's tweets in a disagreement connected to the rescue of 12 boys from a cave in Thailand in July 2018.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Musk called Vernon Unsworth "pedo guy" after Unsworth, who helped with the rescue, ridiculed Musk's proposal to build a mini-submarine during the crisis as a "PR stunt."</p>.<p class="bodytext">The judge rejected Musk's argument that the term "pedo guy" was a common insult and would be seen as an opinion and not a statement of fact.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Wilson said some of Musk's subsequent statements suggested he believed the charge about Unsworth to be true, which has "created a genuine dispute over the meaning of Defendant's Tweets" that "must be resolved by a jury."</p>.<p class="bodytext">Unsworth has denied being a pedophile.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Wilson accepted aspects of Musk's argument that Unsworth was a "limited public figure" who had voluntarily injected himself into the public debate about how to save the boys.</p>.<p class="bodytext">To win a defamation case in US courts, public figures like celebrities must show actual malice on the part of the person making a false statement, as opposed to the lower standard of negligence.</p>.<p class="bodytext">But Wilson ruled Musk should not be shielded him from a defamation lawsuit because the allegation of pedophilia was not connected to the debate about how to save the boys.</p>.<p class="bodytext">"To allow criticism into every aspect of a plaintiff's life simply because he chose to get involved in a limited issue would render him an all-purpose public figure," Wilson wrote in a decision earlier this week.</p>.<p class="bodytext">"For defendant's comments to relate to Plaintiff's participation in public controversies, there must be some relationship between pedophilia and the rescue or the subs -- there is simply no credible connection here."</p>.<p class="bodytext">Alex Spiro, an attorney representing Musk, said in an email that "we look forward to the trial."</p>