<p>The Supreme Court on Wednesday declined to cancel the Common Law Admission Test 2018 and allowed declaration of results as per schedule on May 31.</p>.<p>A bench of Justices L Nageswara Rao and Mohan M Shantanagoudar, however, asked the grievance redressal committee headed by former Kerala High Court judge Justice M R Hariharan Nair to further look into candidates’ complaints including technical glitches, faced by the candidates during the test on May 13 and give a report on June 6.</p>.<p>The court said the committee can consider if some normalisation methods could be used for those who faced problems in appearing in the two-hour test with maximum 200 marks.</p>.<p>“Let’s not cancel the examination. You address the grievances,” the bench told senior advocate V Giri, representing the National University of Advanced Legal Studies (NUALS), Kochi, that conducted the tests with Sify Technologies Ltd.</p>.<p>Senior advocate Salman Khurshid and advocates Zoheb Hossain and Harvinder Chowdhury, appearing for petitioner-candidates, contended apart from technical glitches, mass cheatings were also reported from certain centres.</p>.<p>The court initially considered for postponing the declaration of results for two or three days. But it finally gave a go-ahead for it on Thursday after the counsel indicated some of the candidates who filed complaints would not be able to make through even if some normalisation method for them.</p>
<p>The Supreme Court on Wednesday declined to cancel the Common Law Admission Test 2018 and allowed declaration of results as per schedule on May 31.</p>.<p>A bench of Justices L Nageswara Rao and Mohan M Shantanagoudar, however, asked the grievance redressal committee headed by former Kerala High Court judge Justice M R Hariharan Nair to further look into candidates’ complaints including technical glitches, faced by the candidates during the test on May 13 and give a report on June 6.</p>.<p>The court said the committee can consider if some normalisation methods could be used for those who faced problems in appearing in the two-hour test with maximum 200 marks.</p>.<p>“Let’s not cancel the examination. You address the grievances,” the bench told senior advocate V Giri, representing the National University of Advanced Legal Studies (NUALS), Kochi, that conducted the tests with Sify Technologies Ltd.</p>.<p>Senior advocate Salman Khurshid and advocates Zoheb Hossain and Harvinder Chowdhury, appearing for petitioner-candidates, contended apart from technical glitches, mass cheatings were also reported from certain centres.</p>.<p>The court initially considered for postponing the declaration of results for two or three days. But it finally gave a go-ahead for it on Thursday after the counsel indicated some of the candidates who filed complaints would not be able to make through even if some normalisation method for them.</p>