<p>A day after a wrong date on the notary seal on Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis' poll nomination affidavit kicked up a row, another error crept into the returning officer's order of acceptance on Sunday.</p>.<p>Fadnavis had filed his nomination papers as a BJP candidate for Nagpur South West seat on Friday.</p>.<p>Returning Officer Shekhar Ghadge, in his order, first mentioned the name of the notary on the CM's affidavit as Purushottam Moreshwar Sontakke instead of Vivek Purushottam Sontakke.</p>.<p>A rejoinder from the RO's office to set things right had another error with the name this time being mentioned as Purushottam Narendra Sontakke, along with a request that it be "read as VP Sontakke".</p>.<p>The notary seal on Fadnavis' affidavit mentioned the name as VP Sontakke.</p>.<p>Fadnavis' Congress opponent Ashish Deshmukh termed the bungling in the name as "forgery" and accused the chief minister of "trying to hide something".</p>.<p>"We will approach High Court against the manipulation as Election Commission is not working fairly," Deshmukh said.</p>.<p>The Congress had, on Saturday, demanded rejection of Fadnavis' nomination claiming the date of the notary seal on it had "expired" last December.</p>.<p>The BJP had dismissed the allegation and said it was a "mistake" on part of the notary.</p>.<p>Earlier this week, the alleged non-submission of two criminal cases in his 2014 poll affidavit returned to haunt Fadnavis when the supreme court set aside the Bombay high court's dismissal of a plea and directed that the issue be heard afresh in a lower count.</p>
<p>A day after a wrong date on the notary seal on Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis' poll nomination affidavit kicked up a row, another error crept into the returning officer's order of acceptance on Sunday.</p>.<p>Fadnavis had filed his nomination papers as a BJP candidate for Nagpur South West seat on Friday.</p>.<p>Returning Officer Shekhar Ghadge, in his order, first mentioned the name of the notary on the CM's affidavit as Purushottam Moreshwar Sontakke instead of Vivek Purushottam Sontakke.</p>.<p>A rejoinder from the RO's office to set things right had another error with the name this time being mentioned as Purushottam Narendra Sontakke, along with a request that it be "read as VP Sontakke".</p>.<p>The notary seal on Fadnavis' affidavit mentioned the name as VP Sontakke.</p>.<p>Fadnavis' Congress opponent Ashish Deshmukh termed the bungling in the name as "forgery" and accused the chief minister of "trying to hide something".</p>.<p>"We will approach High Court against the manipulation as Election Commission is not working fairly," Deshmukh said.</p>.<p>The Congress had, on Saturday, demanded rejection of Fadnavis' nomination claiming the date of the notary seal on it had "expired" last December.</p>.<p>The BJP had dismissed the allegation and said it was a "mistake" on part of the notary.</p>.<p>Earlier this week, the alleged non-submission of two criminal cases in his 2014 poll affidavit returned to haunt Fadnavis when the supreme court set aside the Bombay high court's dismissal of a plea and directed that the issue be heard afresh in a lower count.</p>