<p>New Delhi: The <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/tags/supreme-court">Supreme Court</a> on Friday issued notice to the Centre and the <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/tags/enforcement-directorate">Enforcement Directorate</a> on a plea of former Chhattisgarh chief minister Bhupesh Baghel's son, Chaitanya Baghel, challenging <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/india/chhattisgarh/chhattisgarh-liquor-scam-ed-arrests-bhupesh-baghels-son-chaitanya-3636614">his arrest by the ED in an alleged liquor scam case</a> in the state. </p><p>The ED accused Baghel of laundering a part of the proceeds of crime through shell companies and real estate investments.</p><p>A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi asked the Additional Solicitor General S V Raju, appearing for the Centre and the ED, to file the response to the plea in 10 days. </p><p>Senior advocates N Hariharan and Kapil Sibal, for Chaitanya questioned the way the ED arrested Chaitanya. </p>.Former CM Bhupesh Baghel's son ran syndicate, handled Rs 1000 crore of 'liquor scam' proceeds: ED .<p>"They (ED) arrested me on the ground of non-cooperation. But they never sent me a notice. They never summoned me. They never called me. But they arrest me under Section 19 (of PMLA), which they can’t do. They have to issue me a notice. They can’t arrest me on non-cooperation without giving notice," Sibal said.</p><p>Hariharan sought quashing of grounds of his arrest, contending that the ED was needlessly delaying the trial to prolong their client's arrest.</p><p>He claimed the investigation didn't seem to end at all. </p>.Chhattisgarh liquor scam: ED files chargesheet against ex-CM Baghel's son.<p>The bench, however, said, "More than grounds of arrest, it’s about interpretation of law. How long can you keep the accused in custody?"</p><p>Raju submitted that this court granted me time to complete the investigation in three months.</p><p>On October 17, the Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the plea challenging the arrest in the case.</p><p>Terming his arrest as illegal, Chaitanya has challenged the HC's order, claiming that the procedural irregularity on the ED's part has rendered its entire process void.</p>
<p>New Delhi: The <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/tags/supreme-court">Supreme Court</a> on Friday issued notice to the Centre and the <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/tags/enforcement-directorate">Enforcement Directorate</a> on a plea of former Chhattisgarh chief minister Bhupesh Baghel's son, Chaitanya Baghel, challenging <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/india/chhattisgarh/chhattisgarh-liquor-scam-ed-arrests-bhupesh-baghels-son-chaitanya-3636614">his arrest by the ED in an alleged liquor scam case</a> in the state. </p><p>The ED accused Baghel of laundering a part of the proceeds of crime through shell companies and real estate investments.</p><p>A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi asked the Additional Solicitor General S V Raju, appearing for the Centre and the ED, to file the response to the plea in 10 days. </p><p>Senior advocates N Hariharan and Kapil Sibal, for Chaitanya questioned the way the ED arrested Chaitanya. </p>.Former CM Bhupesh Baghel's son ran syndicate, handled Rs 1000 crore of 'liquor scam' proceeds: ED .<p>"They (ED) arrested me on the ground of non-cooperation. But they never sent me a notice. They never summoned me. They never called me. But they arrest me under Section 19 (of PMLA), which they can’t do. They have to issue me a notice. They can’t arrest me on non-cooperation without giving notice," Sibal said.</p><p>Hariharan sought quashing of grounds of his arrest, contending that the ED was needlessly delaying the trial to prolong their client's arrest.</p><p>He claimed the investigation didn't seem to end at all. </p>.Chhattisgarh liquor scam: ED files chargesheet against ex-CM Baghel's son.<p>The bench, however, said, "More than grounds of arrest, it’s about interpretation of law. How long can you keep the accused in custody?"</p><p>Raju submitted that this court granted me time to complete the investigation in three months.</p><p>On October 17, the Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the plea challenging the arrest in the case.</p><p>Terming his arrest as illegal, Chaitanya has challenged the HC's order, claiming that the procedural irregularity on the ED's part has rendered its entire process void.</p>