<p>New Delhi: The <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/tags/election-commission">Election Commission</a> on Thursday sought to reject before the Supreme Court an allegation that there was a "disproportionate exclusion of Muslims" in the Special Intensive Revision exercise carried out in Bihar. </p><p>Election Commission's counsel senior advocate Rakesh Dwivedi submitted before a bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi that the petitioner's (Association of Democratic Reforms, an NGO) argument was based on some name-recognition software, the accuracy of which was doubtful.</p><p>It called the petitioner's argument a "communal approach" which is to be deprecated.</p>.Bihar SIR exercise was 'accurate', claims EC; Supreme Court says poll body expected to look into errors in final electoral roll.<p>Dwivedi maintained that the electoral rolls database does not capture any information about the elector's religion.</p><p>The Election Commission sought dismissal of the batch of pleas which challenged the June 24 decision of the poll panel to conduct the Bihar SIR.</p><p>The Election Commission claimed that the petitioners have “ulterior motives” and are merely content with making “false allegations” to discredit the SIR exercise, final electoral rolls and the Election Commission for the electoral interest of political parties.</p><p>A batch of petitions was filed by ADR, People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL), Yogendra Yadav, Lok Sabha Member from the Trinamool Congress Party Mahua Moitra, Rashtriya Janata Dal MP Manoj Jha, Congress leader K C Venugopal and former Bihar MLA Mujahid Alam.</p>
<p>New Delhi: The <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/tags/election-commission">Election Commission</a> on Thursday sought to reject before the Supreme Court an allegation that there was a "disproportionate exclusion of Muslims" in the Special Intensive Revision exercise carried out in Bihar. </p><p>Election Commission's counsel senior advocate Rakesh Dwivedi submitted before a bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi that the petitioner's (Association of Democratic Reforms, an NGO) argument was based on some name-recognition software, the accuracy of which was doubtful.</p><p>It called the petitioner's argument a "communal approach" which is to be deprecated.</p>.Bihar SIR exercise was 'accurate', claims EC; Supreme Court says poll body expected to look into errors in final electoral roll.<p>Dwivedi maintained that the electoral rolls database does not capture any information about the elector's religion.</p><p>The Election Commission sought dismissal of the batch of pleas which challenged the June 24 decision of the poll panel to conduct the Bihar SIR.</p><p>The Election Commission claimed that the petitioners have “ulterior motives” and are merely content with making “false allegations” to discredit the SIR exercise, final electoral rolls and the Election Commission for the electoral interest of political parties.</p><p>A batch of petitions was filed by ADR, People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL), Yogendra Yadav, Lok Sabha Member from the Trinamool Congress Party Mahua Moitra, Rashtriya Janata Dal MP Manoj Jha, Congress leader K C Venugopal and former Bihar MLA Mujahid Alam.</p>