<p>New Delhi: A court here on Monday extended the stay on further investigation into Law Minister <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/tags/kapil-mishra">Kapil Mishra's</a> alleged role in the 2020 northeast Delhi riots till May 7.</p>.<p>Special Judge Kaveri Baweja passed the order after she was told that the notice issued by the court to some of the respondents on April 9 could not be served.</p>.<p>On April 9, the judge stayed the probe against Mishra till April 21 on an application filed by the minister against a magisterial court order.</p>.Bengal: One of prime accused in murder of father-son in riot-hit Murshidabad held.<p>Judge Baweja issued notice to Ilyas and others on April 9 and directed them to respond by April 21.</p>.<p>Senior advocate P K Dubey appeared for Mishra and Special Public Prosecutor Amit Prasad represented Delhi Police.</p>.<p>Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (ACJM) Vaibhav Chaurasia said on April 1 that a cognisable offence was "prima facie" found that needed to be investigated.</p>.<p>"It is clear that Mishra was in the area at the time of alleged offence. Further probe required," the magistrate said.</p>.<p>He was hearing arguments on a plea filed by a Yamuna Vihar resident, Mohammad Ilyas, seeking registration of an FIR against Mishra. Delhi Police had opposed the move, saying Mishra had no role in the riots. </p>
<p>New Delhi: A court here on Monday extended the stay on further investigation into Law Minister <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/tags/kapil-mishra">Kapil Mishra's</a> alleged role in the 2020 northeast Delhi riots till May 7.</p>.<p>Special Judge Kaveri Baweja passed the order after she was told that the notice issued by the court to some of the respondents on April 9 could not be served.</p>.<p>On April 9, the judge stayed the probe against Mishra till April 21 on an application filed by the minister against a magisterial court order.</p>.Bengal: One of prime accused in murder of father-son in riot-hit Murshidabad held.<p>Judge Baweja issued notice to Ilyas and others on April 9 and directed them to respond by April 21.</p>.<p>Senior advocate P K Dubey appeared for Mishra and Special Public Prosecutor Amit Prasad represented Delhi Police.</p>.<p>Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (ACJM) Vaibhav Chaurasia said on April 1 that a cognisable offence was "prima facie" found that needed to be investigated.</p>.<p>"It is clear that Mishra was in the area at the time of alleged offence. Further probe required," the magistrate said.</p>.<p>He was hearing arguments on a plea filed by a Yamuna Vihar resident, Mohammad Ilyas, seeking registration of an FIR against Mishra. Delhi Police had opposed the move, saying Mishra had no role in the riots. </p>