<p>Mangaluru: Around 100 bones and a skull were among the human remains found on Monday during exhumation in connection to the alleged Dharmasthala mass burials case.</p><p>These remains were found on the sixth day of the exhumation process in the forest area near the Netravati bathing ghat in Dharmasthala police station limits.</p><p>“The skeletal remains were found on the surface about 100 metres away from the 11th site shown by the complainant-witness. Around 100 bones, including a skull and spinal bones, were recovered,” SIT sources said.</p>. <p>“The skeletal parts recovered suggest they may belong to two individuals. A long spinal column was also found. The expert team has collected it scientifically. A knotted saree was also found at the same location,” said SIT sources.</p><p>The sari was tied at a height of six feet on the tree, SIT sources said.</p><p>The SIT team entered the forest around 11.30 am and continued its search uninterrupted till 6.15 pm, even skipping the lunch break. </p><p>The skeletal remains were sealed in three buckets and two PVC pipes before being transported out of the forest.</p><p>The complainant-witness had earlier identified 13 possible burial sites near the Dharmasthala bathing ghat and inside the forest. Of these, 10 have been excavated so far in sequence.</p><p>Although the 11th site was scheduled to be dug on Monday, the complainant-witness requested excavation at a different location nearby instead.</p><p>About 20 labourers were deployed for the day’s operation. Though a mini earthmover was brought to the site, it was not used in the forest.</p>.Advocate seeks radar tech for Dharmasthala exhumation .<p>Shortly after the team entered inside the forest, two sacks of salt were brought in. Four commandos were also deployed by SIT officials to secure the area.</p><p>Puttur assistant commissioner Stella Varghese and SIT superintendent of police Jitendra Kumar Dayama were present.</p><p><br>On July 31, skeletal remains of a male were discovered at the sixth site identified by the complainant-witness. However, no human remains were found at the other nine sites that had been previously dug.</p>.Dharmasthala 'mass burial' case: Judge recuses amid conflict of interest claim.<p><strong>Man files plaint with Dharmasthala Police</strong></p><p>A complaint has been filed at the Dharmasthala police station by Jayant T, citing the suspicious death of a girl, aged around 13 to 15 years, that occurred nearly 15 years ago in Dharmasthala village. Jayant stated that the girl's body was buried without a post-mortem, and no FIR was registered at the time.</p><p>A resident of Ichlampady, Jayant initially approached the SIT office in Belthangady with details of the alleged incident. After reviewing the complaint, SIT officials directed him to lodge a formal complaint with the Dharmasthala police. Dakshina Kannada SP Dr Arun K confirmed that the complaint was received on Monday, and further action will follow.</p><p>“I respect the law of the land. Four to five people who witnessed the burial of the girl 15 years ago are prepared to testify during the investigation,” Jayant said.</p><p>He clarified that his complaint is not directed at any individual or temple. “My intention is only to highlight that police officials erred back then, and appropriate action should be taken.”</p><p>Jayant, an RTI activist, has been actively involved in the fight for justice in the Sowjanya murder case. “Since 2015, I have been fighting for a corruption-free society. I am not against any individual, nor do I support anyone. I am not anti-temple, nor a communist. In fact, we worship two deities at home and have built a temple on our land. I have compiled crucial documents related to the Sowjanya case using the RTI Act,” he added.</p>
<p>Mangaluru: Around 100 bones and a skull were among the human remains found on Monday during exhumation in connection to the alleged Dharmasthala mass burials case.</p><p>These remains were found on the sixth day of the exhumation process in the forest area near the Netravati bathing ghat in Dharmasthala police station limits.</p><p>“The skeletal remains were found on the surface about 100 metres away from the 11th site shown by the complainant-witness. Around 100 bones, including a skull and spinal bones, were recovered,” SIT sources said.</p>. <p>“The skeletal parts recovered suggest they may belong to two individuals. A long spinal column was also found. The expert team has collected it scientifically. A knotted saree was also found at the same location,” said SIT sources.</p><p>The sari was tied at a height of six feet on the tree, SIT sources said.</p><p>The SIT team entered the forest around 11.30 am and continued its search uninterrupted till 6.15 pm, even skipping the lunch break. </p><p>The skeletal remains were sealed in three buckets and two PVC pipes before being transported out of the forest.</p><p>The complainant-witness had earlier identified 13 possible burial sites near the Dharmasthala bathing ghat and inside the forest. Of these, 10 have been excavated so far in sequence.</p><p>Although the 11th site was scheduled to be dug on Monday, the complainant-witness requested excavation at a different location nearby instead.</p><p>About 20 labourers were deployed for the day’s operation. Though a mini earthmover was brought to the site, it was not used in the forest.</p>.Advocate seeks radar tech for Dharmasthala exhumation .<p>Shortly after the team entered inside the forest, two sacks of salt were brought in. Four commandos were also deployed by SIT officials to secure the area.</p><p>Puttur assistant commissioner Stella Varghese and SIT superintendent of police Jitendra Kumar Dayama were present.</p><p><br>On July 31, skeletal remains of a male were discovered at the sixth site identified by the complainant-witness. However, no human remains were found at the other nine sites that had been previously dug.</p>.Dharmasthala 'mass burial' case: Judge recuses amid conflict of interest claim.<p><strong>Man files plaint with Dharmasthala Police</strong></p><p>A complaint has been filed at the Dharmasthala police station by Jayant T, citing the suspicious death of a girl, aged around 13 to 15 years, that occurred nearly 15 years ago in Dharmasthala village. Jayant stated that the girl's body was buried without a post-mortem, and no FIR was registered at the time.</p><p>A resident of Ichlampady, Jayant initially approached the SIT office in Belthangady with details of the alleged incident. After reviewing the complaint, SIT officials directed him to lodge a formal complaint with the Dharmasthala police. Dakshina Kannada SP Dr Arun K confirmed that the complaint was received on Monday, and further action will follow.</p><p>“I respect the law of the land. Four to five people who witnessed the burial of the girl 15 years ago are prepared to testify during the investigation,” Jayant said.</p><p>He clarified that his complaint is not directed at any individual or temple. “My intention is only to highlight that police officials erred back then, and appropriate action should be taken.”</p><p>Jayant, an RTI activist, has been actively involved in the fight for justice in the Sowjanya murder case. “Since 2015, I have been fighting for a corruption-free society. I am not against any individual, nor do I support anyone. I am not anti-temple, nor a communist. In fact, we worship two deities at home and have built a temple on our land. I have compiled crucial documents related to the Sowjanya case using the RTI Act,” he added.</p>