<p>Hathras (UP): An MP-MLA court here on Tuesday dismissed a petition filed against Samajwadi Party Rajya Sabha MP Ramji Lal Suman over alleged derogatory remarks against Rana Sanga, a Rajput ruler of Mewar during the early 16th century.</p>.<p>Judge Deepak Nath Saraswati ruled that no legal proceedings can be initiated against a Member of Parliament for remarks made during a parliamentary session.</p>.<p>The petition was filed by Matendra Singh Gehlot, who claimed that Suman insulted the Kshatriya community by referring to Rana Sanga as a "traitor" during a speech in the Rajya Sabha.</p>.SP MP Ramji Lal Suman writes to President, alleges threat to life.<p>Gehlot stated that he is a descendant of Rana Sanga and the community regards Sanga's legacy with pride and honour.</p>.<p>Prior to this plea, Gehlot had also attempted to lodge a police complaint against the MP.</p>.<p>However, citing Article 105 of the Constitution and related legal provisions, the court held that no court has jurisdiction over statements made by MPs within Parliament, and accordingly dismissed the plea.</p>
<p>Hathras (UP): An MP-MLA court here on Tuesday dismissed a petition filed against Samajwadi Party Rajya Sabha MP Ramji Lal Suman over alleged derogatory remarks against Rana Sanga, a Rajput ruler of Mewar during the early 16th century.</p>.<p>Judge Deepak Nath Saraswati ruled that no legal proceedings can be initiated against a Member of Parliament for remarks made during a parliamentary session.</p>.<p>The petition was filed by Matendra Singh Gehlot, who claimed that Suman insulted the Kshatriya community by referring to Rana Sanga as a "traitor" during a speech in the Rajya Sabha.</p>.SP MP Ramji Lal Suman writes to President, alleges threat to life.<p>Gehlot stated that he is a descendant of Rana Sanga and the community regards Sanga's legacy with pride and honour.</p>.<p>Prior to this plea, Gehlot had also attempted to lodge a police complaint against the MP.</p>.<p>However, citing Article 105 of the Constitution and related legal provisions, the court held that no court has jurisdiction over statements made by MPs within Parliament, and accordingly dismissed the plea.</p>