<p>A group of women lawyers approached the Supreme Court asking it to set aside the Madhya Pradesh High Court's direction to a rape accused to get 'rakhi' tied by the victim as a condition for bail, saying it is gross trivialisation of the trauma suffered by the complainant.</p>.<p>In their plea, they said that it has been seen in sexual assault cases, women and families do not seek redressal from the criminal justice system primarily to avoid such kind of secondary trauma that they are subjected to in the process of a criminal trial.</p>.<p>They asked whether High Court ought not to have employed circumspection and sensitivity while dealing with a case involving a sexual offence and also related to wrongful entry into the property of the victim.</p>.<p>The "public-spirited" lawyers led by Aparna Bhat said that imposing a condition where the accused would be required to go to the house of the complainant on the festival of 'Raksha Bandhan' and request her to tie a rakhi around his wrist with the “promise to protect her to the best of his ability for all times to come” resulted in further victimisation of the survivor in her own house.</p>.<p>They challenged the validity of the Madhya Pradesh HC's order of July 30 by which the accused was also told to pay Rs 11,000 to the complainant as customary ritual and seek her blessings and pay Rs 5,000 to her son for the purchase of clothes and sweets.</p>.<p>"While it is routine for courts to award certain compensation to survivors of sexual offences to be paid by the accused, it is highly objectionable for the HC in the present case to put the complainant in a position where she is forced to accept the sum of Rs 11,000," they said.</p>.<p>They further pointed out that the present case was of particular concern since it has taken years to undo the damaging approach followed by courts whereby cases involving sexual offences committed against women were attempted to be compromised by way of marriage or mediation between the accused and the survivor.</p>
<p>A group of women lawyers approached the Supreme Court asking it to set aside the Madhya Pradesh High Court's direction to a rape accused to get 'rakhi' tied by the victim as a condition for bail, saying it is gross trivialisation of the trauma suffered by the complainant.</p>.<p>In their plea, they said that it has been seen in sexual assault cases, women and families do not seek redressal from the criminal justice system primarily to avoid such kind of secondary trauma that they are subjected to in the process of a criminal trial.</p>.<p>They asked whether High Court ought not to have employed circumspection and sensitivity while dealing with a case involving a sexual offence and also related to wrongful entry into the property of the victim.</p>.<p>The "public-spirited" lawyers led by Aparna Bhat said that imposing a condition where the accused would be required to go to the house of the complainant on the festival of 'Raksha Bandhan' and request her to tie a rakhi around his wrist with the “promise to protect her to the best of his ability for all times to come” resulted in further victimisation of the survivor in her own house.</p>.<p>They challenged the validity of the Madhya Pradesh HC's order of July 30 by which the accused was also told to pay Rs 11,000 to the complainant as customary ritual and seek her blessings and pay Rs 5,000 to her son for the purchase of clothes and sweets.</p>.<p>"While it is routine for courts to award certain compensation to survivors of sexual offences to be paid by the accused, it is highly objectionable for the HC in the present case to put the complainant in a position where she is forced to accept the sum of Rs 11,000," they said.</p>.<p>They further pointed out that the present case was of particular concern since it has taken years to undo the damaging approach followed by courts whereby cases involving sexual offences committed against women were attempted to be compromised by way of marriage or mediation between the accused and the survivor.</p>
