<p class="title">The Delhi High Court today dismissed US-based agro major Monsanto Technology's plea to enforce the patent for its BT cotton seeds in India.</p>.<p class="bodytext">A bench of Justices S Ravindra Bhat and Yogesh Khanna partially allowed the counter-claims of three Indian seed companies that Monsanto does not have a patent for its BT cotton seeds, a genetically modified variant which resists bollworms.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The court also upheld the decision of a single judge on the issue of trait fee payable to Monsanto by the three Indian companies -- Nuziveedu Seeds Ltd, Prabhat Agri Biotech Ltd and Pravardhan Seeds Private Ltd -- under the sub-licence with them.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The single judge had said that the Indian companies would pay trait fees to Monsanto according to government-set rates.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Monsanto wanted to charge a higher rate of trait fee under the sub-licence given to Indian companies to use its seed technology.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Both sides had challenged the single judge's order before the division bench.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Monsanto had challenged the single judge's decision reinstating a sub-licence between it and the three Indian seed companies, which the foreign entity had terminated.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The Indian companies in their appeal had challenged the rejection of their claim by the single judge that the US-based agro major Monsanto was incorrectly granted patent for BT cotton seeds.</p>.<p class="bodytext">After the verdict was pronounced, Monsanto sought that the decision be kept in abeyance for a few weeks so that it can file an appeal in the Supreme Court.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The high court declined to keep the operation of its decision in bench, but granted the US company a certificate of fitness to file an appeal in the apex court.</p>
<p class="title">The Delhi High Court today dismissed US-based agro major Monsanto Technology's plea to enforce the patent for its BT cotton seeds in India.</p>.<p class="bodytext">A bench of Justices S Ravindra Bhat and Yogesh Khanna partially allowed the counter-claims of three Indian seed companies that Monsanto does not have a patent for its BT cotton seeds, a genetically modified variant which resists bollworms.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The court also upheld the decision of a single judge on the issue of trait fee payable to Monsanto by the three Indian companies -- Nuziveedu Seeds Ltd, Prabhat Agri Biotech Ltd and Pravardhan Seeds Private Ltd -- under the sub-licence with them.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The single judge had said that the Indian companies would pay trait fees to Monsanto according to government-set rates.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Monsanto wanted to charge a higher rate of trait fee under the sub-licence given to Indian companies to use its seed technology.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Both sides had challenged the single judge's order before the division bench.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Monsanto had challenged the single judge's decision reinstating a sub-licence between it and the three Indian seed companies, which the foreign entity had terminated.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The Indian companies in their appeal had challenged the rejection of their claim by the single judge that the US-based agro major Monsanto was incorrectly granted patent for BT cotton seeds.</p>.<p class="bodytext">After the verdict was pronounced, Monsanto sought that the decision be kept in abeyance for a few weeks so that it can file an appeal in the Supreme Court.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The high court declined to keep the operation of its decision in bench, but granted the US company a certificate of fitness to file an appeal in the apex court.</p>