<p>A dejected V Jayadevan, who sought replacement of the controversial Duckworth-Lewis method with his own system in limited-over cricket, has approached the ICC President Sharad Pawar for a neutral review of his method.<br /><br /></p>.<p>Alleging bias, Jayadevan said one of the experts in the ICC Cricket Committee, which recently evaluated his system and rejected it, behaved like a spokesperson of Duckworth and Lewis method and thus his system should be re-evaluated by neutral experts.<br /><br />In its recent meeting in London, the ICC Cricket Committee, headed by former West Indies captain Clive Lloyd, had decided that there was no need to replace the D/L method by the VJD method. Jayadevan, an engineer from Kerala, wrote a letter to Pawar, explaining to him <br />in detail why the method should be considered again.<br /><br />“Many people in the cricket community, believe the VJD System is a better system than the D/L. For the last 12 years, I’m trying hard to convince the authorities about this,” he said.<br /><br />“I feel that it is the commitment of ICC to provide the best available system to the cricket community. I have no hesitation in saying that the said expert’s strong favoritism to the D/L system deprives the ICC from getting the best available method for the last so many years,” he wrote.</p>
<p>A dejected V Jayadevan, who sought replacement of the controversial Duckworth-Lewis method with his own system in limited-over cricket, has approached the ICC President Sharad Pawar for a neutral review of his method.<br /><br /></p>.<p>Alleging bias, Jayadevan said one of the experts in the ICC Cricket Committee, which recently evaluated his system and rejected it, behaved like a spokesperson of Duckworth and Lewis method and thus his system should be re-evaluated by neutral experts.<br /><br />In its recent meeting in London, the ICC Cricket Committee, headed by former West Indies captain Clive Lloyd, had decided that there was no need to replace the D/L method by the VJD method. Jayadevan, an engineer from Kerala, wrote a letter to Pawar, explaining to him <br />in detail why the method should be considered again.<br /><br />“Many people in the cricket community, believe the VJD System is a better system than the D/L. For the last 12 years, I’m trying hard to convince the authorities about this,” he said.<br /><br />“I feel that it is the commitment of ICC to provide the best available system to the cricket community. I have no hesitation in saying that the said expert’s strong favoritism to the D/L system deprives the ICC from getting the best available method for the last so many years,” he wrote.</p>