<p>New Delhi: The <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/tags/supreme-court">Supreme Court</a> on Thursday took exception to a plea for an FIR against Delhi High Court judges and members of Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), by terming it "scandalous" and "publicity stunt".</p><p>A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi, however, appointed former judge and senior advocate S Muralidhar as amicus curiae in the matter to assist the court after the petitioner alleged the tribunal during the course of hearing said it was going to allow his application but dismissed it behind his back.</p><p>The plea has been filed by an IIM graduate, Ravi Kumar.</p><p>"You are such a learned fellow. Tell us under what provisions of law do the judges and members of the tribunal are liable to be prosecuted for giving judgement against you. You cannot ask for registration of FIR against the judges," the bench told the petitioner.</p>.Tribal woman entitled to equal share in ancestral property: Supreme Court.<p>The petitioner impleaded sitting and former judges of the Delhi High Court and Allahabad High Court aside from some members of CAT.</p><p>"We understand this is a scandalous petition for a publicity stunt. Don't you think that when you indulge in this kind of scandalous petition, how it is going to affect you," the bench asked him.</p><p>As the bench sought to know his credentials, the petitioner said, he had done engineering from Delhi and management from IIM, Kozhikode.</p><p>His counsel said his client had enrolled into law to take up cases of corruption.</p><p>He claimed after the tribunal dismissed his petition, the Delhi High Court also did the same thing and no benches were ready to hear his case.</p><p>"The case remains pending before every bench, every bench looks into the gravity of the matter, calls the ASG, calls an affidavit from the government and later dismisses it," the counsel said.</p><p>The bench, however, asked him, "If there's an illegal, erroneous or perverse kind of order or judgment rendered by a judicial forum, does it mean, you will implead the judges by name? And you will ask for registration of FIR?"</p><p>The court finally asked the copy of the petition be served to the amicus curiae.</p>
<p>New Delhi: The <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/tags/supreme-court">Supreme Court</a> on Thursday took exception to a plea for an FIR against Delhi High Court judges and members of Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), by terming it "scandalous" and "publicity stunt".</p><p>A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi, however, appointed former judge and senior advocate S Muralidhar as amicus curiae in the matter to assist the court after the petitioner alleged the tribunal during the course of hearing said it was going to allow his application but dismissed it behind his back.</p><p>The plea has been filed by an IIM graduate, Ravi Kumar.</p><p>"You are such a learned fellow. Tell us under what provisions of law do the judges and members of the tribunal are liable to be prosecuted for giving judgement against you. You cannot ask for registration of FIR against the judges," the bench told the petitioner.</p>.Tribal woman entitled to equal share in ancestral property: Supreme Court.<p>The petitioner impleaded sitting and former judges of the Delhi High Court and Allahabad High Court aside from some members of CAT.</p><p>"We understand this is a scandalous petition for a publicity stunt. Don't you think that when you indulge in this kind of scandalous petition, how it is going to affect you," the bench asked him.</p><p>As the bench sought to know his credentials, the petitioner said, he had done engineering from Delhi and management from IIM, Kozhikode.</p><p>His counsel said his client had enrolled into law to take up cases of corruption.</p><p>He claimed after the tribunal dismissed his petition, the Delhi High Court also did the same thing and no benches were ready to hear his case.</p><p>"The case remains pending before every bench, every bench looks into the gravity of the matter, calls the ASG, calls an affidavit from the government and later dismisses it," the counsel said.</p><p>The bench, however, asked him, "If there's an illegal, erroneous or perverse kind of order or judgment rendered by a judicial forum, does it mean, you will implead the judges by name? And you will ask for registration of FIR?"</p><p>The court finally asked the copy of the petition be served to the amicus curiae.</p>