<p class="bodytext">During Kumbh all took a holy dip but real seekers immerse themselves in satsang, which is real Amrit snaan (moksha/immortality). I am witness to one such satsang and sharing it with you all. </p>.<p class="bodytext">Seeker: Why am I ?</p>.<p class="bodytext">Master: I am Not. Only That is. </p>.<p class="bodytext">Seeker: Why That is ? </p>.<p class="bodytext">Master: Ask this question to That who is. </p>.<p class="bodytext">Seeker: Where will I find That who is?</p>.<p class="bodytext">Master: First in some particular human being you will find inkling and inference (anumaan) of That. Later your story in his/her/they’s association will evolve to become different (provided you stuck to your seeking) and you will find that that particular human being is omnipresent. Ofcourse not as human being but as remembrance, as wisdom, as voice, as consciousness, as presence. </p>.<p class="bodytext">Seeker: you are also a human being. Why can’t you be That for me.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Master: Do you see Me(I) as That ?</p>.<p class="bodytext">Seeker : No master I don’t see you as That. </p>.<p class="bodytext">Master: Then, you are not qualified to ask this question to me(I) And, because of your disqualification I am not qualified to answer this question to you at this point in time.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Those who are qualified to ask they are qualified to receive answer from the one whom they ask this question. When you see I/me as That then alone you may ask this question to me/I/you/That. Because I already see you as That so I can answer this to you. Why can’t you see me as That ? Ask yourself this question. </p>.<p class="bodytext">Explanation is that when one experiences that then on knowing “who am I”, I cease to be, only attributes are experienced by the wisdom /existence by that /it self. Attributes like, how am I, where am I etc. And, I can ask “why am I “ only when ‘I am’, else who will ask whom ? Therefore to ask this question that “why am I? ” my presence is a prerequisite.</p>.<p class="bodytext">When That asks That self “why am I“ then That self knows That self, that why That is. As That is omnipresent and omniscient. ‘This’ or ‘I’ is that state /period of the omniscient/omnipresent in which “This” doesn’t know “That” as that really is.</p>.<p class="bodytext">By knowing ‘That’, ‘This’ ceases to be. This is the limit of reasoning based intellectual understanding. Once this is over then trust <br />based relationship begins. Knowledge is exploration of that relationship.</p>
<p class="bodytext">During Kumbh all took a holy dip but real seekers immerse themselves in satsang, which is real Amrit snaan (moksha/immortality). I am witness to one such satsang and sharing it with you all. </p>.<p class="bodytext">Seeker: Why am I ?</p>.<p class="bodytext">Master: I am Not. Only That is. </p>.<p class="bodytext">Seeker: Why That is ? </p>.<p class="bodytext">Master: Ask this question to That who is. </p>.<p class="bodytext">Seeker: Where will I find That who is?</p>.<p class="bodytext">Master: First in some particular human being you will find inkling and inference (anumaan) of That. Later your story in his/her/they’s association will evolve to become different (provided you stuck to your seeking) and you will find that that particular human being is omnipresent. Ofcourse not as human being but as remembrance, as wisdom, as voice, as consciousness, as presence. </p>.<p class="bodytext">Seeker: you are also a human being. Why can’t you be That for me.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Master: Do you see Me(I) as That ?</p>.<p class="bodytext">Seeker : No master I don’t see you as That. </p>.<p class="bodytext">Master: Then, you are not qualified to ask this question to me(I) And, because of your disqualification I am not qualified to answer this question to you at this point in time.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Those who are qualified to ask they are qualified to receive answer from the one whom they ask this question. When you see I/me as That then alone you may ask this question to me/I/you/That. Because I already see you as That so I can answer this to you. Why can’t you see me as That ? Ask yourself this question. </p>.<p class="bodytext">Explanation is that when one experiences that then on knowing “who am I”, I cease to be, only attributes are experienced by the wisdom /existence by that /it self. Attributes like, how am I, where am I etc. And, I can ask “why am I “ only when ‘I am’, else who will ask whom ? Therefore to ask this question that “why am I? ” my presence is a prerequisite.</p>.<p class="bodytext">When That asks That self “why am I“ then That self knows That self, that why That is. As That is omnipresent and omniscient. ‘This’ or ‘I’ is that state /period of the omniscient/omnipresent in which “This” doesn’t know “That” as that really is.</p>.<p class="bodytext">By knowing ‘That’, ‘This’ ceases to be. This is the limit of reasoning based intellectual understanding. Once this is over then trust <br />based relationship begins. Knowledge is exploration of that relationship.</p>
