×
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Krill kill in Antarctic has environmentalists worried

A major food source for the whales is now a hit as human food supplement
Last Updated 15 March 2012, 17:30 IST

One recent morning at the bottom of the world, Kim Bernard spotted two humpback whales gorging in the Southern Ocean not far offshore.

Bernard, a biological oceanographer, was spending the austral summer at Palmer Station, the US research outpost on an outcropping off the western Antarctic Peninsula. Bernard and her team, known at Palmer as ‘The Psycho Krillers,’ are studying the feeding patterns of Antarctic krill, the small, bug-eyed shrimplike crustaceans that are the central diet for whales, penguins, seals and seabirds.

She is one of a growing number of scientists concerned about the effects of a kind of gold rush, as fishing companies race to the Southern Ocean to catch krill and turn it into animal feed and lucrative omega-3 dietary supplements.

The former Soviet Union began fishing krill in the ocean in the 1960s, but it was not until the 1990s that Luc Rainville, a graduate student at the University of Victoria in British Columbia, discovered that the omega-3 fatty acids in Antarctic krill were readily absorbed by the human body. In 2002, he helped found a company, Neptune Biotechnologies and Bioresources, to bring krill oil to the market as a supplement.

The annual krill harvest is still well within the limits set by the Convention on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources, which regulates fishing in the Southern Ocean. Some scientists say the Antarctic krill fishery is the world’s most underexploited marine resource. But fishing is not the only threat to the krill population. The creatures, especially in their larval and juvenile stages, feed on algae that live on the underside of sea ice – which is retreating as the climate warms.

And while no one argues that Antarctic krill are currently threatened or overfished, scientists and environmental groups fear that as more companies deploy more vessels – especially huge factory ships – fishing and climate change could prove a double blow to krill and the delicate Antarctic food web that depends on them.
 “I’m not worried at current levels of the fishing effort,” said Deborah K Steinberg, a biological oceanographer at the Virginia Institute of Marine Science in Gloucester Point who oversees Bernard’s krill research at Palmer Station. “But I do worry about the future if the industry really starts to take off. We have to keep a close eye on it.”

The western Antarctic Peninsula is warming faster than most of the rest of the earth. Winter temperatures have shot up roughly 11 degrees Fahrenheit over the past 60 years, reducing sea ice cover. Those and other effects of climate change have caused Antarctic krill populations to plummet 40 to 80 percent in the last three decades around the South Shetland Islands near the tip of the peninsula, according to research published last May in The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The research, led by Wayne Z Trivelpiece of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, also showed that populations of Adelie and chinstrap penguins, which rely heavily on krill, declined more than 50 per cent in the northern peninsula, where krill fishing vessels concentrate.

Active approach

Marine scientists are working hard to make sure the Antarctic krill fishery does not collapse as many others, like Atlantic cod, have. At a meeting in November in Hobart, Australia, an international science advisory committee called for a more active approach to fisheries management.

“We’d rather not have a krill fishery,” said John Hocevar, director of Greenpeace USA’s Oceans Campaign, who represented the United States at the meeting. “But this is the world we live in. The fact that they’re in the Southern Ocean is as much an acknowledgment of the failure of fisheries management on a global scale.”

New krill-harvesting technology introduced by Aker BioMarine of Norway, the largest krill fishing company in the South Atlantic, has made it economically feasible to send vessels to the punishingly icy waters at the bottom of the world. These factory ships continuously vacuum up krill (Aker calls it ‘eco-harvesting’) and process it immediately on the ship. Last year Aker, which started harvesting krill in 2006, bought a second factory ship.

Many major retailers, including CVS, Costco and Wal-Mart, sell krill oil capsules along with other omega-3 supplements. Most come from krill oil processed by Aker BioMarine and its main rival, Neptune. Whole Foods Market pulled krill oil from its shelves in May 2010, citing a decline in predatory sea animals – whales, penguins and seals – in areas where krill are fished.

But Aker has gained two important allies. Its krill oil was approved by the Marine Stewardship Council, a global programme that issues labels certifying seafood products as sustainable, despite objections from some scientists and environmental organizations. And Aker has joined forces with WWF-Norway, an arm of the international environmental organization WWF, paying it an undisclosed amount to help Aker make its fishing practices more sustainable. Aker also provides data on krill populations to WWF-Norway and scientists studying krill and its predators.

“Krill is one of the more sustainable fisheries today,” said Matts Johansen, head of marketing at Aker BioMarine. “Compared with fish oil it’s very sustainable. And it comes from the cleanest waters on earth, with no pollutants.”

Wael Massrieh, vice president of scientific affairs at Neptune, said the company was also applying for eco-certification and was awaiting regulatory approval in the United States for a drug based on krill oil. Because “krill is at the bottom of the food chain,” he said, “it doesn’t accumulate as many heavy metals” as fish-based oils. Vegetarian alternatives, particularly algae-based omega-3 oil made by the Netherlands company Royal DSM NV, are also gaining ground. Altogether, sales of omega-3 supplements reached more than $1 billion in 2009 in the United States alone, up from $40 million in 1995. The claimed benefits include improving heart, brain and vision health.

Back at the bottom of the world, Bernard was thinking much more about krill health than human health on a recent morning as she plunged an echo sounder from her rubber Zodiac boat into the Southern Ocean, its water just 31 degrees Fahrenheit.
The reading looked good. “There was a massive influx!” she wrote by email. I had never seen so much krill on the echogram before.'' She collected nearly 1,000 krill in a plankton net. A whale nearby was ready to grab the ones Bernard missed; it can eat four tons of krill each day.

Bernard attributed the abundance to a healthy buildup of sea ice last winter. But the long-term trend is less certain, she said, and that does not bode well for krill or the larger creatures that depend on them. On a good day just a year earlier, she noted, she had caught a mere 10 lonely krill.

ADVERTISEMENT
(Published 15 March 2012, 17:30 IST)

Follow us on

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT