<p>A CBI court here today fixed March 21 for arguments on framing of charges in a bribery case involving retired Punjab and Haryana High Court judge Nirmal Yadav.<br /><br /></p>.<p>Yadav was granted permission from personal exemption today by CBI Judge Vimal Kumar due to "backache".<br /><br />The prosecuting agency sought time to file reply on an application moved by one of the accused Sanjeev Bansal that no case was made out against him.<br /><br />Bansal sought from the court that he should be dischraged as no case was made against him, defence counsel Vishal Garg Narwana contended.<br /><br />The CBI sought time to respond to the application moved by the defence.<br />CBI special prosecutor Anupam Gupta told the court that evidence in the case was sufficient for framing of charges against the accused.<br /><br />In August 2008, an amount of Rs 15 lakh was delivered at the house of Justice Nirmaljit Kaur in Chandigarh. The matter was reported to the police.<br /><br />It was stated that the money was actually meant for Justice Nirmal Yadav, which had been sent by Delhi-based hotelier Ravinder Singh Bhasin and had been delivered at the wrong address. The investigation of the case was later handed over to the CBI.<br /><br />The charge sheet was filed against her by the CBI, a day after Yadav, then posted as a judge of the Uttarakhand High Court, retired.<br />Earlier, the CBI had filed closure report in the case on the ground that prosecution sanction had been declined, but the special CBI judge had refused to accept the report.<br /><br />On being approached again by the CBI, the President had granted sanction for prosecution on March 1 last year.<br /><br />On August 27 last, Yadav had appeared for the first time before the CBI special court hearing the case and was granted bail after furnishing a bond of Rs 25,000.<br />The others include in the case are advocate Sanjeev Bansal, Delhi-based hotelier Ravinder Singh Bhasin, Chandigarh-based businessman Rajiv Gupta and Nirmal Singh.</p>
<p>A CBI court here today fixed March 21 for arguments on framing of charges in a bribery case involving retired Punjab and Haryana High Court judge Nirmal Yadav.<br /><br /></p>.<p>Yadav was granted permission from personal exemption today by CBI Judge Vimal Kumar due to "backache".<br /><br />The prosecuting agency sought time to file reply on an application moved by one of the accused Sanjeev Bansal that no case was made out against him.<br /><br />Bansal sought from the court that he should be dischraged as no case was made against him, defence counsel Vishal Garg Narwana contended.<br /><br />The CBI sought time to respond to the application moved by the defence.<br />CBI special prosecutor Anupam Gupta told the court that evidence in the case was sufficient for framing of charges against the accused.<br /><br />In August 2008, an amount of Rs 15 lakh was delivered at the house of Justice Nirmaljit Kaur in Chandigarh. The matter was reported to the police.<br /><br />It was stated that the money was actually meant for Justice Nirmal Yadav, which had been sent by Delhi-based hotelier Ravinder Singh Bhasin and had been delivered at the wrong address. The investigation of the case was later handed over to the CBI.<br /><br />The charge sheet was filed against her by the CBI, a day after Yadav, then posted as a judge of the Uttarakhand High Court, retired.<br />Earlier, the CBI had filed closure report in the case on the ground that prosecution sanction had been declined, but the special CBI judge had refused to accept the report.<br /><br />On being approached again by the CBI, the President had granted sanction for prosecution on March 1 last year.<br /><br />On August 27 last, Yadav had appeared for the first time before the CBI special court hearing the case and was granted bail after furnishing a bond of Rs 25,000.<br />The others include in the case are advocate Sanjeev Bansal, Delhi-based hotelier Ravinder Singh Bhasin, Chandigarh-based businessman Rajiv Gupta and Nirmal Singh.</p>