Towards being an educated superpower

FLAWED India has an education system that is failing generations of children, opine Shashank Vira and Mark Runacres

Afar-reaching Right to Education Act obliges the central and state governments to provide eight years of free and compulsory education to all children between 6 and 14 years of age. However, the country is a long way from achieving that goal. Most worryingly, the education being delivered to those in schools is well below global par while the percentage of school dropouts is conversely above global par.

Nearly 540 million Indians are under the age of 25 years. The labour force is expected to grow by 32 per cent over the next 20 years, whereas it will decline by four per cent in industrialised countries and by nearly five per cent in China. India's favourable demographic profile can add significantly to its economic-growth potential for the next three decades provided that its young people are educated and trained properly.

India has one of the largest higher-education systems in the world and ranks second in terms of student enrolment. But while the country has 621 universities and 33,500 colleges, only a few are world-class institutions. The need for education reform has never been clearer. Also, even though India with universities and colleges comprising one of the largest network of higher education institutes across the world and second in terms of student enrolment, its Gross Enrolment Ratio (GER) of 18.8 per cent in 2011 is still less than the world average of 26 per cent. Global experiences indicate a positive correlation between GER and economic growth in the country and point to the need for a minimum of 30 per cent to sustain economic growth. Still, India spends only 1.2 per cent of its gross domestic product on higher education, compared to 3.1 per cent in the United States or 2.4 per cent in South Korea. Needles to say, the figure should be much higher.

India’s ambitions for the 21st century seem unlikely to be fulfilled without the country taking real steps to fix the education system in very short term.

There are clear improvements in the education system, in particular at the elementary level, where the government’s Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan initiative has seen huge increases in primary enrolment, along with the various midday meal schemes, which attract poorer sections of the population. But this, or even overall increases in literacy, are far from sufficient to prepare young people for productive employment. A fast-growing economy needs young people to be educated in such a way that they can make responsible life choices, get the right jobs and lead the society towards positive change. The fundamental and troubling question is: how will India’s millions be educated?

The government closely guards the Indian education sector while the judiciary has given it a very loosely defined not-for-profit tag. Accordingly, investments need to be carefully structured so that they cannot be construed as profiteering from students.

While there is a clear recognition that private and non-governmental funding of education is needed, there is lack of clarity on the form that acceptable financial returns from this sector might take.

The current legal and regulatory framework does provide opportunities for joint ventures between foreign educational institutes and Indian institutions in the K-12, HEI and NFI segments. The NFI segment is particularly ripe for foreign investment and strategic alliances as it operates outside the regulatory constraints on foreign investment in many cases.

Although 100 per cent foreign direct investment through automatic route is permitted in education sector, the present legal structure in India does not allow granting of degrees by foreign educational institutions, thereby restricting independent operations by foreign players.

The government has therefore introduced several important bills in the Parliament relating to accreditation, foreign universities, educational tribunals and unfair practices to completely restructure the legal and regulatory environment of higher education. But political opposition has stalled the legislative progress of some of these measures.
While regulatory changes are long-overdue, there is a lot that can be done within the existing structure and regulation of education in the country. Besides, the main gap is that of translating plans into action and making projects operational. Early stage tax and regulatory advice is a must so that such pitfalls can be worked through in an investor-friendly manner. The real issue is one of quality and this permeates every layer of education from primary to higher.

India can benefit from building stronger bridges to global centres of educational excellence. We see a real global interest in making a success of Indian education. It would help if businesses keep in mind the market incentive to invest in education towards change. In a multi-stakeholder approach, businesses can partner with non-profit organisations for creative ideas, and with governments for scale and experience.

The challenges are no doubt enormous. There are children from families too poor to think about education, beyond the reach of schooling and too malnourished to study.

There are too few schools, classrooms, teaching resources and adequately trained teachers. Rampant illiteracy underpins other problems including exploding populations, gender imbalances and poverty. But it is for the government to ensure that appropriate policies are framed and meticulously implemented to meet the future aspirations of India’s youth.

There is recognition within the Indian government that the demand-supply gap in education sector has to be bridged through opening up participation from private, non-governmental and international players. The government, civil society, and the private sector thus need to work together to educate the Indian youth.

(The writers are partners at a specialised advisory firm focused on improving the delivery of education.)