<p align="justify">In most schools, we have rigid 45-minute periods and strict subject boundaries. There are fixed lesson plans, schedules to be adhered to, and syllabus to be finished before the end of the year. In that context, it would be considered sacrilegious for an English teacher to trespass into the domain of the History faculty. It would be considered wrong to have a 45-minute period without assigning it a subject name.<br /><br />So, in English class, we study textbooks containing short stories and poems. In History class, we learn about The Second World War, or the Russian Revolution. But they never mix. What if we use a historical fiction like Ken Follett’s Winter of the World to study both the history of the Second World War and English? While teaching different systems of governance (which is part of the secondary syllabus), how about using George Orwell’s Animal Farm to illustrate communism?<br /><br />But, some people might say, stop, how can you propose something like this? What are we going to call this subject? And who is going to teach it – the English teacher or the History teacher? At the expense of real, enjoyable learning, we must stick to our 45-minute periods. We must stick to the routine of assigning fixed hours to individual subjects. We must go through the motions. Going through the motions lulls us into a false sense of complacency that learning must be happening.<br /><br />Don’t compartmentalise<br /><br />In real life, problems do not come packaged in narrow subject boundaries. In History, a revolution is often sparked by economic inequities, a war by geographical disputes. Geography again is interlinked with Physics and Chemistry. Why don’t we open our students’ minds to boundless possibilities of learning? Why do we limit their minds with standard textbooks or syllabus?<br /><br />It is the same mindset that creates the obsession with the number of subjects. I heard parents saying, “In XYZ school, they have nine subjects – why do we have only four here?” As if doubling the number of subjects will double learning. Sometimes, parents of students studying at the kindergarten level ask, “When will History or Geography be introduced? When will my child study Computer Science?”<br />Schools also end up pandering to such demands. So, they teach Computer Science to kids of Class I even though they may have just taught them to paint. They introduce History or Geography even before the children have learnt to read fluently. Moral Science is introduced as a subject, but the children’s minds remain full of prejudices related to caste, race, religion and gender, fed continuously by all of us – at home, at school, everywhere.<br /><br />As we remain obsessed with textbooks with narrow subject boundaries, we ignore other avenues of learning. We forget how we adults got to learn most of the stuff that we use now. We developed our reading skills by reading novels and newspapers. We learnt to use technology by experimenting ourselves and asking our friends. We learnt about the latest events and trends from newspapers and magazines. And we used movies to learn about culture and social situations that we haven’t experienced ourselves. We learnt about other places and languages by travelling outside our home state and country.<br /><br />Story books, newspapers, movies, friends and travel have been some of our most important sources of learning. Why don’t we use them more at school and home? In History, instead of memorising mind-numbing dates and names, why not show them a historical movie like Richard Attenborough’s Gandhi or Roman Polanski’s The Pianist? In Civics, instead of asking them to memorise the minimum qualifications needed for a member of parliament, why not have a class where we discuss election news from the previous day’s newspaper<br /><br />As parents, why don’t we encourage our kids to make more friends rather than bury themselves in textbooks? Instead of memorising the capital cities of countries, why don’t we engage them in discussions about events happening in countries all over the world? Instead of complaining about the lack of homework during the summer vacation, why not take our children to places where they can experience a different culture?<br /><br />As Einstein has said, “Education is what remains after one has forgotten what one has learnt in school.”</p>.<p align="justify"><br />(The author is founder, Levelfield, West Bengal)</p>
<p align="justify">In most schools, we have rigid 45-minute periods and strict subject boundaries. There are fixed lesson plans, schedules to be adhered to, and syllabus to be finished before the end of the year. In that context, it would be considered sacrilegious for an English teacher to trespass into the domain of the History faculty. It would be considered wrong to have a 45-minute period without assigning it a subject name.<br /><br />So, in English class, we study textbooks containing short stories and poems. In History class, we learn about The Second World War, or the Russian Revolution. But they never mix. What if we use a historical fiction like Ken Follett’s Winter of the World to study both the history of the Second World War and English? While teaching different systems of governance (which is part of the secondary syllabus), how about using George Orwell’s Animal Farm to illustrate communism?<br /><br />But, some people might say, stop, how can you propose something like this? What are we going to call this subject? And who is going to teach it – the English teacher or the History teacher? At the expense of real, enjoyable learning, we must stick to our 45-minute periods. We must stick to the routine of assigning fixed hours to individual subjects. We must go through the motions. Going through the motions lulls us into a false sense of complacency that learning must be happening.<br /><br />Don’t compartmentalise<br /><br />In real life, problems do not come packaged in narrow subject boundaries. In History, a revolution is often sparked by economic inequities, a war by geographical disputes. Geography again is interlinked with Physics and Chemistry. Why don’t we open our students’ minds to boundless possibilities of learning? Why do we limit their minds with standard textbooks or syllabus?<br /><br />It is the same mindset that creates the obsession with the number of subjects. I heard parents saying, “In XYZ school, they have nine subjects – why do we have only four here?” As if doubling the number of subjects will double learning. Sometimes, parents of students studying at the kindergarten level ask, “When will History or Geography be introduced? When will my child study Computer Science?”<br />Schools also end up pandering to such demands. So, they teach Computer Science to kids of Class I even though they may have just taught them to paint. They introduce History or Geography even before the children have learnt to read fluently. Moral Science is introduced as a subject, but the children’s minds remain full of prejudices related to caste, race, religion and gender, fed continuously by all of us – at home, at school, everywhere.<br /><br />As we remain obsessed with textbooks with narrow subject boundaries, we ignore other avenues of learning. We forget how we adults got to learn most of the stuff that we use now. We developed our reading skills by reading novels and newspapers. We learnt to use technology by experimenting ourselves and asking our friends. We learnt about the latest events and trends from newspapers and magazines. And we used movies to learn about culture and social situations that we haven’t experienced ourselves. We learnt about other places and languages by travelling outside our home state and country.<br /><br />Story books, newspapers, movies, friends and travel have been some of our most important sources of learning. Why don’t we use them more at school and home? In History, instead of memorising mind-numbing dates and names, why not show them a historical movie like Richard Attenborough’s Gandhi or Roman Polanski’s The Pianist? In Civics, instead of asking them to memorise the minimum qualifications needed for a member of parliament, why not have a class where we discuss election news from the previous day’s newspaper<br /><br />As parents, why don’t we encourage our kids to make more friends rather than bury themselves in textbooks? Instead of memorising the capital cities of countries, why don’t we engage them in discussions about events happening in countries all over the world? Instead of complaining about the lack of homework during the summer vacation, why not take our children to places where they can experience a different culture?<br /><br />As Einstein has said, “Education is what remains after one has forgotten what one has learnt in school.”</p>.<p align="justify"><br />(The author is founder, Levelfield, West Bengal)</p>
