<p>The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear a plea challenging the validity of Bombay High Court judgement, which gave its stamp of approval to the quota for the Maratha community in jobs and education in Maharashtra.</p>.<p>A bench of Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justices Deepak Gupta and Aniruddha Bose posted the matter arising out of June 27 judgement of the High Court for hearing on Friday.</p>.<p>A plea for urgent hearing was made up before the bench by a counsel.</p>.<p>The Bombay High Court, in its June 27 order, said the 50 % cap on reservation imposed by the apex court could be exceeded only in exceptional circumstances. It said a 12 and a 13 % quota to the Maratha community in education and jobs respectively could be allowed.</p>.<p>It was contended that the decision had breached the 50-per cent ceiling on reservation fixed by the apex court in its landmark judgment by the nine-judge bench in the 'Indra Sahwney' case (1992), also known as the "Mandal verdict".</p>
<p>The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear a plea challenging the validity of Bombay High Court judgement, which gave its stamp of approval to the quota for the Maratha community in jobs and education in Maharashtra.</p>.<p>A bench of Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justices Deepak Gupta and Aniruddha Bose posted the matter arising out of June 27 judgement of the High Court for hearing on Friday.</p>.<p>A plea for urgent hearing was made up before the bench by a counsel.</p>.<p>The Bombay High Court, in its June 27 order, said the 50 % cap on reservation imposed by the apex court could be exceeded only in exceptional circumstances. It said a 12 and a 13 % quota to the Maratha community in education and jobs respectively could be allowed.</p>.<p>It was contended that the decision had breached the 50-per cent ceiling on reservation fixed by the apex court in its landmark judgment by the nine-judge bench in the 'Indra Sahwney' case (1992), also known as the "Mandal verdict".</p>
