<p>New Delhi: The <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/tags/supreme-court">Supreme Court</a> on Friday expressed reservations over the Delhi High Court passing 30 to 40 pages anticipatory bail orders and said it was "something disgusting".</p>.<p>A bench of Justices Surya Kant and N Kotiswar Singh which was hearing an appeal against a high court order said, "What is happening in the Delhi High Court is something disgusting. The high court writing 30-40 pages while disposing of an anticipatory bail plea is like hinting the trial court that here is a reason for you to convict. Essentially, it's a conviction order." </p><p>The top court was hearing the bail plea of medical practitioner Aadhar Khera in a cheating case.</p>.Narco terror case: Supreme Court calls charges 'serious', junks bail plea of accused.<p>Khera moved the top court against the order of the Delhi High Court, which in its 34-page order on February 6, denied him the reprieve.</p>.<p>Senior advocate Siddharth Luthra, appearing for Khera, submitted it was the petitioner's father who was running the firm in question through the petitioner and his mother.</p>.<p>He said the high court equated his role with his father and denied the petitioner anticipatory bail ignoring the fact that he had joined the investigation in the case.</p>.<p>Luthra argued that the chargesheet was filed in the case.</p>.<p>Following the submissions, the bench sought the response of Delhi Police and granted Khera protection from arrest in the case. </p>
<p>New Delhi: The <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/tags/supreme-court">Supreme Court</a> on Friday expressed reservations over the Delhi High Court passing 30 to 40 pages anticipatory bail orders and said it was "something disgusting".</p>.<p>A bench of Justices Surya Kant and N Kotiswar Singh which was hearing an appeal against a high court order said, "What is happening in the Delhi High Court is something disgusting. The high court writing 30-40 pages while disposing of an anticipatory bail plea is like hinting the trial court that here is a reason for you to convict. Essentially, it's a conviction order." </p><p>The top court was hearing the bail plea of medical practitioner Aadhar Khera in a cheating case.</p>.Narco terror case: Supreme Court calls charges 'serious', junks bail plea of accused.<p>Khera moved the top court against the order of the Delhi High Court, which in its 34-page order on February 6, denied him the reprieve.</p>.<p>Senior advocate Siddharth Luthra, appearing for Khera, submitted it was the petitioner's father who was running the firm in question through the petitioner and his mother.</p>.<p>He said the high court equated his role with his father and denied the petitioner anticipatory bail ignoring the fact that he had joined the investigation in the case.</p>.<p>Luthra argued that the chargesheet was filed in the case.</p>.<p>Following the submissions, the bench sought the response of Delhi Police and granted Khera protection from arrest in the case. </p>