Govt seeks $30 bn from Reliance, BP in KG-D6 gas field dispute

​New Delhi: The government is seeking over USD 30 billion from Reliance Industries Ltd and BP as compensation, alleging the partners built larger-than-required facilities at the KG-D6 fields and subsequently failed to meet natural gas output targets, sources said.

The government made the claim during its submissions before a three-member arbitration tribunal that on November 7 concluded hearings on the 14-year-old dispute. The tribunal is expected to give its award sometime next year and the party that loses will most likely challenge it before the Supreme Court, three sources aware of the matter said.

Sources said the government in the arbitration proceedings sought monetary value of the natural gas that wasn't produced as well as a compensation for excess amount spent on installations, fuel marketing, and interest.

It put the value for all of this at over USD 30 billion.

In a statement, Reliance said, "There is no claim of USD 30 billion against Reliance and BP" and it was "factually incorrect" to state that the government has sought USD 30 billion from it and its partner for underproduction from the KG-D6 gas field.

The claim was made by the government before an arbitration panel which is hearing the dispute. A claim for a compensation before an arbitration panel or a court does not mean that a formal claim has been raised against any party. That statement only translates into an actionable claim once the panel gives its award in favour of the party seeking such compensation.

"The matters referred to in the report are entirely sub judice and would be determined in accordance with the laws of the country by its judicial system, in which Reliance has full faith. Reliance Industries Limited, together with its partner BP has at all times complied with its contractual and legal obligations and take strong exception to mischaracterization of facts in the report," the company statement said.

It acknowledged a demand for USD 247 million in additional profit petroleum that the government made from Reliance and its partner following disallowance of USD 3.02 billion cost, saying the same have been "appropriately and consistently disclosed in the company's annual audited financial statements, in accordance with its disclosure requirements."

The dispute stems from alleged failure of Reliance to comply with approved investment plan that led to under-utilisation of capacity at the Dhirubhai-1 and 3 fields - the first and the largest of discoveries in the Krishna Godavari basin KG-DWN-98/3 (KG-D6) block to be put on production.

Natural gas output from Dhirubhai-1 and 3 (D1&D3) gas fields started to lag company projections from the very second year of production in 2010, and the field ceased to produce in February 2020, much ahead of its projected life.

Reliance, in an initial field development plan, had proposed a USD 2.47 billion investment to produce a peak of 40 million standard cubic meters per day of gas. In 2006, it revised this to USD 8.18 billion, projecting a doubling of that output by drilling 31 wells by March 2011.

But it drilled only 22 wells, of which only 18 were put to production. The well started shuttering earlier than expected due to unanticipated sand and water ingress, leading to the company mid-way revising the reserves in the field to only 3.10 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) instead of 10.03 Tcf estimated in the 2006 plan.

The government blamed the phenomenon on the company not sticking to the approved development plan, and in the initial years, disallowed USD 3.02 billion of costs that Reliance and its partners had incurred on developing the fields.

The company disputed this, saying there is no provision in the KG-D6 contract which entitles the government to disallow cost recovery on that basis. On November 23, 2011, Reliance served an arbitration notice, seeking to resolve the dispute.

The arbitration proceedings, however, couldn't begin as the government refused to accept the judges appointed to the three-member tribunal.

Reliance had in 2014 named former UK judge Sir Bernard Rix as its arbitrator on the tribunal in place of its original choice, S P Bharucha, a former chief justice of India. Justice Bharucha had recused himself from the tribunal where the government had named former chief justice of India V N Khare as its arbitrator.

Michael Kirby, a former judge of the Australian High Court, was in September 2014 appointed by the Supreme Court as the neutral arbitrator and chairman of the panel.

The government moved the Delhi High Court seeking removal of Rix and Kirby, alleging their ex facie bias against the Union government. The court in December 2022 dismissed the Central government's plea as "not maintainable".

The government then moved the Supreme Court, which on January 11, 2023, dismissed the petition. Thereafter, the tribunal began hearing on the dispute.

Sources said in the arbitration proceedings, the government made claims related to the cost of unproduced gas as well as excess amount spent on installations, extra amount recovered on account of marketing margin, and interest.

It put the value for all of this at over USD 30 billion.

Reliance and BP, which had bought a 30 per cent stake in KG-D6 and 21 other blocks in 2010 for USD 7.2 billion, contended that the production sharing contracts (PSCs) under New Exploration Licensing Policy (NELP) explicitly allow an operator to first recover all its development costs fully, before sharing profits from the production with the government.

They argued that finding oil and gas is a high-risk business, solely borne by the operator. In case of D1&D3, the reserves were downsized due to geological factors and the output lagged targets because of unforeseen geological surprises.

The reserve downgrade is not a new phenomenon and companies worldwide have done the same. The same thing has happened in the KG block which was originally with Gujarat government firm GSPC but was later sold to state-owned ONGC.

They claimed to have followed all rules and all investments incurred on the block were approved by a management committee (MC) that had representatives of the Directorate General of Hydrocarbons (DGH) and the Oil Ministry.

Sources said they termed the ministry's action of "retroactively" disallowing some of the costs already incurred as being against the signed PSC.

Gas output from D1&D3 fields in KG-D6 block was supposed to be 80 million standard cubic meters per day but actual production was only 35.33 mmscmd in 2011-12, 20.88 mmscmd in 2012-13 and 9.77 mmscmd in 2013-14. The output continued to drop in the subsequent years and the fields ceased to produce in February 2020.

The Government, by its letters dated May 2, 2012, November 14, 2013, July 10, 2014 and June 3, 2016, disallowed USD 3.02 billion costs which the PSC entitled Reliance and its partners to recover. This disallowance was for missing the target during six years beginning April 1, 2010. In these four notices, the government sought USD 247 million of additional profit petroleum after cost recovery was disallowed.

Reliance and its partner have maintained that a contractor is entitled to recover all of its costs under the terms of the PSC and there are no provisions that entitle the government to disallow the recovery of any cost.

The PSC allows them to deduct all capital and operating expenses from the sale of gas before sharing profit with the government.

Reliance held 60 per cent interest in block KG-DWN-98/3 or KG-D6 in the Bay of Bengal. BP had 30 per cent and Niko the remaining 10 per cent. Facing cash problems, Niko exited the blocks, leaving Reliance with 66.66 per cent stake and the balance with BP.