<p>The High Court on Tuesday said it would not entertain any petition filed by students challenging the re-evaluation of answer scripts pertaining to various examinations such as SSLC, PUC, diploma, degree and other courses.<br /><br /></p>.<p>Hearing a petition filed by Poornima Siddarameshwar of Bangalore, challenging the re-evaluation of her diploma examination paper, Justice Ram Mohan Reddy passed the order and asked students not to approach courts challenging re-evaluation pleas.<br /><br />The judge dismissed the petition and said, “If the court interferes in re-evaluation cases, there would be thousands of petitions pertaining to various courses and the court cannot go through every answer script of every paper.”<br /><br />The court also heard another petition seeking re-evaluation by a student who wrote the examination for a secretarial diploma course and got 35 marks, 10 below the pass score.<br /><br /> When he applied for re-evaluation, he secured zero marks. The student approached the court and the judge himself reviewed his answer script. As he struggled to understand what the student had written, the judge, on a lighter note, described the paper as “wonder of wonders”. <br /><br />“I think what you have got in the re-evaluation is the appropriate marks,” he said, and dismissed the petition.</p>
<p>The High Court on Tuesday said it would not entertain any petition filed by students challenging the re-evaluation of answer scripts pertaining to various examinations such as SSLC, PUC, diploma, degree and other courses.<br /><br /></p>.<p>Hearing a petition filed by Poornima Siddarameshwar of Bangalore, challenging the re-evaluation of her diploma examination paper, Justice Ram Mohan Reddy passed the order and asked students not to approach courts challenging re-evaluation pleas.<br /><br />The judge dismissed the petition and said, “If the court interferes in re-evaluation cases, there would be thousands of petitions pertaining to various courses and the court cannot go through every answer script of every paper.”<br /><br />The court also heard another petition seeking re-evaluation by a student who wrote the examination for a secretarial diploma course and got 35 marks, 10 below the pass score.<br /><br /> When he applied for re-evaluation, he secured zero marks. The student approached the court and the judge himself reviewed his answer script. As he struggled to understand what the student had written, the judge, on a lighter note, described the paper as “wonder of wonders”. <br /><br />“I think what you have got in the re-evaluation is the appropriate marks,” he said, and dismissed the petition.</p>
