<p>The Supreme Court on Tuesday said courts cannot interfere with fatwas issued by Muslim clerics unless the religious dictates violate someone’s rights.<br /><br /></p>.<p>A bench presided over by Justice C K Prasad said it was a matter of choice for people to accept fatwas.<br /><br /> The apex court made the observation while reserving its verdict on a public interest litigation against fatwas.<br /><br />During the hearing, the court said running of institutions like Darul Qaza and Darul Iftaa was a religious issue, and that courts should interfere only when someone's rights are violated by their decision. <br /><br />“We can protect people who are subjected to suffering due to this. When a pujari gives a date of Dussehra, he cannot force someone to celebrate the festival on that day. If somebody forces them on you, then can we protect you,” said the bench.<br /><br />A PIL filed by Delhi-based advocate Vishwa Lochan Madan contended that fatwas issued by clerics were unconstitutional.<br /></p>
<p>The Supreme Court on Tuesday said courts cannot interfere with fatwas issued by Muslim clerics unless the religious dictates violate someone’s rights.<br /><br /></p>.<p>A bench presided over by Justice C K Prasad said it was a matter of choice for people to accept fatwas.<br /><br /> The apex court made the observation while reserving its verdict on a public interest litigation against fatwas.<br /><br />During the hearing, the court said running of institutions like Darul Qaza and Darul Iftaa was a religious issue, and that courts should interfere only when someone's rights are violated by their decision. <br /><br />“We can protect people who are subjected to suffering due to this. When a pujari gives a date of Dussehra, he cannot force someone to celebrate the festival on that day. If somebody forces them on you, then can we protect you,” said the bench.<br /><br />A PIL filed by Delhi-based advocate Vishwa Lochan Madan contended that fatwas issued by clerics were unconstitutional.<br /></p>
