USA responsible

The news from Iraq is worrisome. Sunni fanatics under the banner of ISIS (the Islamic State of Iraq and Greater Syria) have seized Mosul and Tikrit and are marching towards Baghdad to oust Nurial al-Maliki’s shaky pro-Shia government.

The ISIS, backed by Saudi-Wahabi elements, hopes to create a Sunni state in eastern Syria and north-central Iraq for a start and spread its tentacles through fundamentalist terror even while al Qaeda, the Taliban and Lashkar-e-Toiba continue their depredations in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Unrest could affect Iraqi oil production and force up prices.

The United States must bear heavy responsibility for some of these developments. It unsettled West Asia by its invasion of Iraq on totally spurious grounds.

It then built the Taliban in Afghanistan and Pakistan in the name of fighting Soviet atheism and went on to wink at Pakistan’s nefarious nuclear programme all of which have unsettled the world in the name of fighting the war on terror.

It brought further instability in the region by attacking Libya, threatening Iran and then intervening in Syria, each action setting off new tremours, upsetting the Shia-Sunni balance in the region and sharpening ethnic and denominational rivalries
As America prepares to draw down its remaining forces in Afghanistan, developments in Pakistan have taken a new turn.

Following the Tehrik-e-Taliban’s revenge attacks on Karachi airport, the Pakistan military has launched an offensive against the rebels in their hide-outs, creating a hiatus in the peace talks that were initiated but had not gone very far. The military has also been more assertive in going after Geo-TV for openly criticising the ISI and has let Musharraf off the hook by letting him go abroad to escape justice.

The attack on the Indian consulate in Herat and a new series of cross-border incidents were perhaps intended as signals by the army that the Nawaz Sharif-Narendra Modi bonhomie should not go too far.

Who comes out on top remains to be seen, but whatever the odds in this internal struggle for democracy in Pakistan, India should remain steadfast in encouraging liberal elements and giving them space while asserting that terror and peace talks cannot go hand in hand.

In this context, Arun Jaitley did well on a recent visit to the Valley to state that the government is willing to talk to the separatists.

This follows Umar Farooq’s recent call for talks amid a hardening of the separatists’ stand on local elections.

The controversy over Jaitley’s statement that any settlement must be within the ambit of the Constitution is misplaced. Nothing unconstitutional is obviously possible, and so the correct reading of the defence minister’s remark can only be that any settlement must fit within an acceptable amendment of the constitution.

Article 370 debate

The Article 370 debate is fatuous and irrelevant as this provision is only a mechanism to regulate Centre-State relations. Article I read with Schedule 1 of the Indian Constitution and taken with the J&K Constitution makes it absolutely clear that the State is an integral part of India. However, the moot point is what kind of settlement is possible.

The outline has long been manifest, most recently in the 2007 Manmohan-Musharraf formula. This would make boundaries irrelevant by permitting free movement and trade across the LOC and, gradually, building up common consultative and substantive mechanisms with representatives from both sides.

This could develop into a loose confederation with a great deal of internal autonomy on either side. A common market and common currency in Saarc was envisaged by the Eminent Persons Group quite some time ago and was endorsed by all the then members.
Activating Article VII of the Indus Treaty on Future Co-operation holds key to progress.

The proposition has not been seriously looked at by the two Indus Commissioners who have focussed exclusively at narrow engineering considerations and not at the larger framework of political co-operation that could not only optimise joint use of the Indus waters but lay the foundation for restoring integrated management and development of the Indus basin and enable both sides to cope with the exigencies of climate change in all its aspects from the Tibetan plateau-Karakoram-Himalaya to the sea.

This would give India access to the northern and western Indus and its tributaries of the Indus in Gilgit-Baltistan and the PoK, and Pakistan similar access to the upper Indus.

Hydro-electric power has been the flavour of the week, with the PM’s visit to Bhutan, which was energy-centric, and prospects of the Supreme Court reviewing its rather sweeping ban on Upper Ganga hydel schemes. The 2013 Uttarakhand disaster was not caused by dams but was mitigated by them.

The Northeast too has a huge hydel potential waiting to be harnessed against mistaken green opposition. Every KW of energy means “x” jobs and India needs to augment off-farm employment by no less than 10-11 m jobs per annum. Here too the country’s muddled N-E policy framework and administrative structure need radical review.

At home, the government has stirred a hornet’s nest by suggesting that governors are agents of the ruling dispensation and must therefore quit when the regime changes. This is the plain meaning of the home minister’s uncalled for hint to UPA-appointed governors.

This is not only contrary to the Supreme Court’s 2010 ruling but reduces governors to mere puppets.

This is not the Constitutional intent and replaying the follies of the Congress in this regard offers no defence though men like H R Bhardwaj, the Karnataka Governor, have been blatantly partisan and disgraced their office. Nor should old and tired party cronies be offered these sinecures.

DH Newsletter Privacy Policy Get top news in your inbox daily
GET IT
Comments (+)