<p>The Karnataka High Court on Tuesday disposed off a public interest litigation (PIL) on illegal flexes and banners erected in the city citing it to be unclear.</p>.<p class="bodytext">However, the petitioner was directed by the court to file a fresh petition regarding the issue.</p>.<p class="bodytext">A division bench of acting Chief Justice, H G Ramesh and Justice, P S Dinesh Kumar were hearing a PIL filed by Sai Datta. Datta had moved the court seeking directions to remove the illegal hoardings, flexes and banners erected in the city.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The bench asked if there was any law that restricted such banners and hoardings and if they were illegal .</p>.<p class="bodytext">The court also asked the petitioner to specify the areas where such flex banners and hoardings were put up. The petitioner's counsel could not specify the locations.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The bench orally observed that the petition was vague in nature and needed to be structured with the required information.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The court also stated that the issue of illegal hoardings was a serious concern.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The court thereafter directed the petitioner to file a fresh petition and disposed the matter.</p>
<p>The Karnataka High Court on Tuesday disposed off a public interest litigation (PIL) on illegal flexes and banners erected in the city citing it to be unclear.</p>.<p class="bodytext">However, the petitioner was directed by the court to file a fresh petition regarding the issue.</p>.<p class="bodytext">A division bench of acting Chief Justice, H G Ramesh and Justice, P S Dinesh Kumar were hearing a PIL filed by Sai Datta. Datta had moved the court seeking directions to remove the illegal hoardings, flexes and banners erected in the city.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The bench asked if there was any law that restricted such banners and hoardings and if they were illegal .</p>.<p class="bodytext">The court also asked the petitioner to specify the areas where such flex banners and hoardings were put up. The petitioner's counsel could not specify the locations.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The bench orally observed that the petition was vague in nature and needed to be structured with the required information.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The court also stated that the issue of illegal hoardings was a serious concern.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The court thereafter directed the petitioner to file a fresh petition and disposed the matter.</p>