<p>A Mumbai court on Friday allowed the anticipatory bail plea of 'Slumdog Millionaire' actor Madhur Mittalin a sexual harassment case filed by his ex-girlfriend.</p>.<p>Based on the woman's complaint, Khar police had booked Mittal under IPC sections 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), 354A (sexual harassment), 354B (use of criminal force to disrobe a woman), 354(D) (stalking) and 509 (words or gestures intending to insult the modesty of any woman) on February 23.</p>.<p>She has alleged that Mittal sexually harassed and battered her after they broke up.</p>.<p>Fearing arrest, Mittal had approached the court for anticipatory bail through his lawyer, advocate Saveena Bedi.</p>.<p>Bedi denied the allegations and claimed Mittal loved the complainant and always had the intention to marry her.</p>.<p>She had argued that there was delay in filing the FIR and it was done to to "defame" the actor.</p>.<p>Mittal, in his plea, had claimed, even after break up, the complainant wanted to stay in the same house to share the rent but he refused, which made her angry.</p>.<p>The prosecution objected to the plea claiming the actor was constantly harassing the complainant.</p>.<p>After hearing submission by both the sides, additional sessions judge SP Agarwal allowed the anticipatory bail of the actor.</p>
<p>A Mumbai court on Friday allowed the anticipatory bail plea of 'Slumdog Millionaire' actor Madhur Mittalin a sexual harassment case filed by his ex-girlfriend.</p>.<p>Based on the woman's complaint, Khar police had booked Mittal under IPC sections 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), 354A (sexual harassment), 354B (use of criminal force to disrobe a woman), 354(D) (stalking) and 509 (words or gestures intending to insult the modesty of any woman) on February 23.</p>.<p>She has alleged that Mittal sexually harassed and battered her after they broke up.</p>.<p>Fearing arrest, Mittal had approached the court for anticipatory bail through his lawyer, advocate Saveena Bedi.</p>.<p>Bedi denied the allegations and claimed Mittal loved the complainant and always had the intention to marry her.</p>.<p>She had argued that there was delay in filing the FIR and it was done to to "defame" the actor.</p>.<p>Mittal, in his plea, had claimed, even after break up, the complainant wanted to stay in the same house to share the rent but he refused, which made her angry.</p>.<p>The prosecution objected to the plea claiming the actor was constantly harassing the complainant.</p>.<p>After hearing submission by both the sides, additional sessions judge SP Agarwal allowed the anticipatory bail of the actor.</p>