<p>A mixed reaction emerged to the proposed four-laning of the highway from Nelyadi to Chitradurga at a public consultation meeting held in Chikkamagaluru on Saturday.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The people residing in Mudigere Handpost and Chikkamagaluru Bypass Road areas participated in the<br />meeting.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Bhadra Wildlife Protection Trust Trustee D V Girish said, “There was no need to lay Shishila-Bhairapura Road by felling trees. Shishila-Bhairapura is known for its rainforest. We are not for package 1 of the project from Nelyadi to Mudigere Handpost. There are six roads to connect Dakshina Kannada. The authorities should think about improving the road using the latest technology.”</p>.<p class="bodytext">The proposal does not speak on the management of water resources, he added.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Deputy Commissioner M K Srirangaiah clarified that he is neither for the project nor against it. The programme aims to elicit suggestions from the public, he added.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Environmentalists S Girijashankar said that there is no clarity on the land acquisition for the project. Shishila-Bhairapura receives 300 inches of rainfall annually. The highway should not be laid, he said.</p>.<p class="bodytext">“The laying of the road on Shishila-Bhairapura will affect flora and fauna of the Western Ghats. Instead, it is better to develop Charmadi Ghat,” said wildlife activist G Veeresh.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Civil engineer Stany Nathan said, “The pros and cons of the project have not been revealed. There is a need to keep in mind sustainable development.”</p>.<p class="bodytext">Panchakashari of Dammanahalli said, “The four-laning of the highway will benefit the people. The Forest and Revenue Departments should work in coordination while implementing the project.”</p>.<p class="bodytext">Somegowda of Malaloor said the road will benefit the trade activities.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Amithraj said, “Scientific study should be conducted. A special package should be announced to Shishila -Bhairapura area. There is a need to give priority to development.”</p>.<p class="bodytext">Advocate Yathiraj said, “The project is good. The compensation should be paid for the land acquisition.”</p>.<p class="bodytext">Under package 2, 20 villages in Chikkamagaluru taluk — Machagondanahalli, Kelagooru, Chithavalli, Kudavalli, Vasthare Aladagudde, Mahajiddu, Dambadahalli, Shiragunda, Kadrimidri, Malalooru, Ambale, Mugalavalli, Karthikere, Aradavalli, Ramanahalli, Hosakote, Kyathanabeedu, Lakya, Chikkagowja and Hiregowja - are covered.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Under package 3, seven villages - Kurichikkanahalli, Kengenahalli, Tadabenahalli, Uddeboranahalli, Kenkeri, Srinivasapura, Jakkeri Kavalu - are covered.</p>
<p>A mixed reaction emerged to the proposed four-laning of the highway from Nelyadi to Chitradurga at a public consultation meeting held in Chikkamagaluru on Saturday.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The people residing in Mudigere Handpost and Chikkamagaluru Bypass Road areas participated in the<br />meeting.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Bhadra Wildlife Protection Trust Trustee D V Girish said, “There was no need to lay Shishila-Bhairapura Road by felling trees. Shishila-Bhairapura is known for its rainforest. We are not for package 1 of the project from Nelyadi to Mudigere Handpost. There are six roads to connect Dakshina Kannada. The authorities should think about improving the road using the latest technology.”</p>.<p class="bodytext">The proposal does not speak on the management of water resources, he added.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Deputy Commissioner M K Srirangaiah clarified that he is neither for the project nor against it. The programme aims to elicit suggestions from the public, he added.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Environmentalists S Girijashankar said that there is no clarity on the land acquisition for the project. Shishila-Bhairapura receives 300 inches of rainfall annually. The highway should not be laid, he said.</p>.<p class="bodytext">“The laying of the road on Shishila-Bhairapura will affect flora and fauna of the Western Ghats. Instead, it is better to develop Charmadi Ghat,” said wildlife activist G Veeresh.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Civil engineer Stany Nathan said, “The pros and cons of the project have not been revealed. There is a need to keep in mind sustainable development.”</p>.<p class="bodytext">Panchakashari of Dammanahalli said, “The four-laning of the highway will benefit the people. The Forest and Revenue Departments should work in coordination while implementing the project.”</p>.<p class="bodytext">Somegowda of Malaloor said the road will benefit the trade activities.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Amithraj said, “Scientific study should be conducted. A special package should be announced to Shishila -Bhairapura area. There is a need to give priority to development.”</p>.<p class="bodytext">Advocate Yathiraj said, “The project is good. The compensation should be paid for the land acquisition.”</p>.<p class="bodytext">Under package 2, 20 villages in Chikkamagaluru taluk — Machagondanahalli, Kelagooru, Chithavalli, Kudavalli, Vasthare Aladagudde, Mahajiddu, Dambadahalli, Shiragunda, Kadrimidri, Malalooru, Ambale, Mugalavalli, Karthikere, Aradavalli, Ramanahalli, Hosakote, Kyathanabeedu, Lakya, Chikkagowja and Hiregowja - are covered.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Under package 3, seven villages - Kurichikkanahalli, Kengenahalli, Tadabenahalli, Uddeboranahalli, Kenkeri, Srinivasapura, Jakkeri Kavalu - are covered.</p>