<p> A state government may establish an additional consumer forum in a district if the pendency of complaints at the start of the year went beyond 1,500.</p>.<p class="bodytext">More than one forum can be set up in a district also if the average number of complaints filed in the last three years exceeded 1,000, according to model rules prepared under the Consumer Protection Act.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The new rules also stated that the president of a consumer forum shall be appointed among the serving district judges but it shall not be made without the concurrence of the high court. The appointment could be on a part-time basis if the number of complaints did not exceed 500 at the start of the year.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The Consumer Protection (appointment, salary, allowances and conditions of service of the president and members of the state commission and district forum) Rules, 2017, also proposed conducting a written test and interview for the candidates other than those having judicial backgrounds and those having served in central and state governments.</p>.<p class="bodytext">About five lakh cases were pending disposal in various fora under the Consumer Protection Act across the country, while as many as 400 posts were lying vacant over there.</p>.<p class="bodytext">In January, this year, the Supreme Court has asked the central government to frame comprehensive model rules for appointment in consumer fora.</p>.<p class="bodytext">In a verdict on November 21, 2016, the top court had taken serious note of infrastructural inadequacy and other problems faced by consumer courts and passed a slew of directions for a “systemic overhaul” so that the Consumer Protection Act does not become a “dead letter”.</p>
<p> A state government may establish an additional consumer forum in a district if the pendency of complaints at the start of the year went beyond 1,500.</p>.<p class="bodytext">More than one forum can be set up in a district also if the average number of complaints filed in the last three years exceeded 1,000, according to model rules prepared under the Consumer Protection Act.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The new rules also stated that the president of a consumer forum shall be appointed among the serving district judges but it shall not be made without the concurrence of the high court. The appointment could be on a part-time basis if the number of complaints did not exceed 500 at the start of the year.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The Consumer Protection (appointment, salary, allowances and conditions of service of the president and members of the state commission and district forum) Rules, 2017, also proposed conducting a written test and interview for the candidates other than those having judicial backgrounds and those having served in central and state governments.</p>.<p class="bodytext">About five lakh cases were pending disposal in various fora under the Consumer Protection Act across the country, while as many as 400 posts were lying vacant over there.</p>.<p class="bodytext">In January, this year, the Supreme Court has asked the central government to frame comprehensive model rules for appointment in consumer fora.</p>.<p class="bodytext">In a verdict on November 21, 2016, the top court had taken serious note of infrastructural inadequacy and other problems faced by consumer courts and passed a slew of directions for a “systemic overhaul” so that the Consumer Protection Act does not become a “dead letter”.</p>