<p class="title">The editor of a Singaporean website was charged with defamation on Thursday for publishing a letter alleging corruption among the city-state's leaders, with rights groups criticizing the "heavy-handed" response from authorities.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Singapore has long been criticized for restricting free speech and other political rights, as well as slapping critics with financially ruinous libel suits.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The affluent financial hub is regularly ranked among the world's least corrupt countries and its leaders are sensitive about accusations of graft.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Terry Xu was charged in court with defaming government ministers after his independent media website, The Online Citizen, published a letter stating there was</p>.<p class="bodytext">"Corruption at the highest echelons" of Singapore's government, according to court documents.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Police seized computers and other devices used to operate the website from Xu's residence after receiving a complaint.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The website ceased publication temporarily but is now up and running again.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Xu faces a maximum jail term of two years and a fine, or both.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The letter's author, Daniel De Costa Augustin, was also charged with defamation and breaking computer crime laws for allegedly sending the piece from another person's email account without their consent.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Augustin's letter was published in September under the name "Willy Sum", and did not mention the names of any allegedly corrupt officials or provide any evidence of graft.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Phil Robertson, deputy Asia director at Human Rights Watch, said that Singapore authorities had "once again responded to criticism with criminal charges".</p>.<p class="bodytext">"The government should respond to any inaccuracies in the letter by seeking a correction, apology or retraction, rather than with a heavy-handed criminal prosecution," he said.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Singapore's media scene is dominated by pro-government publications, with critical commentary expressed mostly online.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Officials insist tough libel laws are necessary to protect their reputation from unfounded allegations.</p>
<p class="title">The editor of a Singaporean website was charged with defamation on Thursday for publishing a letter alleging corruption among the city-state's leaders, with rights groups criticizing the "heavy-handed" response from authorities.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Singapore has long been criticized for restricting free speech and other political rights, as well as slapping critics with financially ruinous libel suits.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The affluent financial hub is regularly ranked among the world's least corrupt countries and its leaders are sensitive about accusations of graft.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Terry Xu was charged in court with defaming government ministers after his independent media website, The Online Citizen, published a letter stating there was</p>.<p class="bodytext">"Corruption at the highest echelons" of Singapore's government, according to court documents.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Police seized computers and other devices used to operate the website from Xu's residence after receiving a complaint.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The website ceased publication temporarily but is now up and running again.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Xu faces a maximum jail term of two years and a fine, or both.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The letter's author, Daniel De Costa Augustin, was also charged with defamation and breaking computer crime laws for allegedly sending the piece from another person's email account without their consent.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Augustin's letter was published in September under the name "Willy Sum", and did not mention the names of any allegedly corrupt officials or provide any evidence of graft.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Phil Robertson, deputy Asia director at Human Rights Watch, said that Singapore authorities had "once again responded to criticism with criminal charges".</p>.<p class="bodytext">"The government should respond to any inaccuracies in the letter by seeking a correction, apology or retraction, rather than with a heavy-handed criminal prosecution," he said.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Singapore's media scene is dominated by pro-government publications, with critical commentary expressed mostly online.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Officials insist tough libel laws are necessary to protect their reputation from unfounded allegations.</p>