JOIN USThe latest data from Cryosat shows that there’s a deep reduction in the volume of ice during autumn months. Also, the report shows that a lot of thicker ice appears to have been lost from a region to the north of Greenland, the Canadian archipelago, and to a lesser extent the northeast of Svalbard, writes Jonathan Amos.
The dramatic recent decline in Arctic sea-ice cover is illustrated in new data from Europe’s Cryosat mission. The spacecraft, which uses radar to estimate the thickness of marine floes, has observed a deep reduction in the volume of ice during autumn months. For the years 2010-2012, this is down a third compared with data for 2003-2008.
For winter months, the fall in volume is not so great — down nine per cent over the same period. A lot of thicker ice appears to have been lost from a region to the north of Greenland, the Canadian archipelago, and to a lesser extent the northeast of Svalbard.
We have become accustomed to the big retreats in sea-ice area that occur in summer. Last year saw the smallest extent yet measured in the satellite era.
But the latest Cryosat report gives an indication of the status of the floes during the months when the seasonal refreeze occurs with the advance of colder temperatures. “We’ve only been in orbit with Cryosat for two complete winters, and so it is not possible at the moment to discern any long-term trends,” explained mission scientist Katharine Giles, from the Centre for Polar Observation and Modeling at University College London.
“But as the mission moves forward, we will get more and more information and that will help us describe better the patterns that are emerging.” Cryosat was launched by the European Space Agency in early 2010.
A measure of thickness
It is what is known as an altimetry mission, using advanced radar to measure the difference in height between the top of the marine ice and the top of the water in the cracks, or leads, that separate the floes. From this number, scientists can with a relatively simple calculation work out the thickness of the ice.
Multiplying by the area gives an overall volume, and it is the volume that is likely to provide the most reliable assessment of the changes now underway in the Arctic.
The data gathered so far by Cryosat were compared with information compiled by NASA’s Icesat spacecraft in the mid-2000s. For autumn (October-November), the analysis found the Icesat years from 2003 to 2008 to have recorded an average volume of 11,900 cubic kilometers.
But from 2010 to 2012, this average had dropped to 7,600 cubic kilometers — a decline of 4,300 cubic kilometers — as observed by Cryosat. For winter (February-March), the 2003 to 2008 period saw an average of 16,300 cubic kilometers, dropping to 14,800 cubic kilometers between 2010 and 2012, a difference of 1,500 cubic kilometers.
The smaller relative decline in winter volume highlights an interesting “negative feedback.”
“Thin ice grows more quickly than thick ice in the winter. Ice acts as an insulator — the thinner the ice, the more heat can be lost to the atmosphere and the faster the water beneath the ice can freeze,” Giles said.
“But even with an increased ice growth during the winter, we can see from the Cryosat data that it’s still not fully compensating for the deep summer melt.”
Cryosat’s altimetry observations agree well with independent measures of sea-ice thickness derived from aircraft surveys and under-ice moorings.
They also look very similar to the simulations coming out of Piomas (Pan-Arctic Ice-Ocean Modeling and Assimilation System), an influential computer model that has been used to estimate Arctic sea-ice volume and which has been the basis for several predictions about when summer sea ice might disappear completely.
Lesser in autumn
“The decline predicted by Piomas is slightly less in the autumn and slightly more in winter, but broadly speaking there’s good agreement,” said Giles.
A paper describing the latest Cryosat results has been published online in the journal Geophysical Research Letters. Its lead author was University College London’s Seymour Laxon, the renowned polar scientist who tragically died following an accident on New Year’s Day.
Laxon solved the problem of separating ice from water in the satellite altimeter signal.
This has allowed scientists to retrieve information about the Arctic Ocean region’s gravity field, its surface circulation, and the thickness of its sea-ice cover.
More recently, his techniques have begun to reveal how the changing ice cover might affect the interaction between the Arctic Ocean and the atmosphere.
“Seymour’s work provided evidence with which to propose and eventually launch the Cryosat mission, which is now — as his last paper describes — providing the first observations of the annual cycle of sea-ice growth and decay throughout the Arctic Ocean,” Giles said.