<p>Rallying parties against Modi government's Land Acquisition Bill in its present form, Congress today asked Jayalalithaa-led AIADMK to "demonstrate" its commitment to farmers by opposing the legislation in Rajya Sabha though it had backed it in Lok Sabha.<br /><br /></p>.<p>Congress leader Jairam Ramesh told reporters here that the BJP's controversial Land Acquisition Act was "dictatorial" in nature as it was brought in through an ordinance without discussion and had done away with many of the pro-farmer povisions made in a similar Act brought in by the Congress-led UPA in 2013.<br /><br />The amendments include removing the "no consent clause", doing away with social impact study, allowing the acquired land to remain unused for years together besides allowing land to be acquired outside proposed industrial corridors which will help a few industrialists and land developers, he said.<br /><br />He appealed to all like-minded parties and those claiming to be pro-farmers and pro-land owners to oppose the BJP's Land Act, besides asking the ruling party in Tamil Nadu (AIADMK) to also oppose it in the Upper House.<br /><br />"AIADMK has the opportunity in the Rajya Sabha to demonstrate its support for farmers, farm labourers and land owners," by opposing the Bill, he said.<br /><br />With a 37-member strength in the Lok Sabha, AIADMK had backed the government on this matter, drawing strong response from opposition parties in the state including DMK and CPI(M).<br /><br />However, Jayalalithaa had stoutly defended her party's support, saying it was extended only after AIADMK's amendments were incorporated. <br /><br />Ramesh said there were provisions that a state government can 'improve on the legislation' if it wants to, the Modi government's law, however, set the framework for the entire country and it has demonstrated with the amendments that the ruling BJP at Centre was 'fundamentally anti-farmer'.<br /><br />"It is true that a state can pass its own land acquisition law which can improve on the central law. But the central law has its own importance. My question to AIADMK is if you want to pass a progressive law in Tamil Nadu it is fine, but why support a dictatorial law in Centre," he asked.<br /><br />Putting aside political differences, like-minded parties should stand by Congress in this matter as it was aimed at the welfare of the farmers, he said.<br /><br />Ramesh said the UPA's Land Acquisition Act was brought after proper discussions with states and other stakeholders in a 'democractic' way but the BJP had not done so and had adopted a 'dictatorial' method and 'pushed it in Lok Sabha' due to BJP's strong majority.<br /><br />While the UPA's 2013 Act was aimed at replacing the 1894 Act by enhancing compensation among others, the NDA government was bringing back the British era legislation, he charged.<br /><br />He opposed any attempts to 'dilute' the UPA's Land Act and vowed to oppose the Government inside and outside Parliament and take support of like-minded parties. <br /><br /></p>
<p>Rallying parties against Modi government's Land Acquisition Bill in its present form, Congress today asked Jayalalithaa-led AIADMK to "demonstrate" its commitment to farmers by opposing the legislation in Rajya Sabha though it had backed it in Lok Sabha.<br /><br /></p>.<p>Congress leader Jairam Ramesh told reporters here that the BJP's controversial Land Acquisition Act was "dictatorial" in nature as it was brought in through an ordinance without discussion and had done away with many of the pro-farmer povisions made in a similar Act brought in by the Congress-led UPA in 2013.<br /><br />The amendments include removing the "no consent clause", doing away with social impact study, allowing the acquired land to remain unused for years together besides allowing land to be acquired outside proposed industrial corridors which will help a few industrialists and land developers, he said.<br /><br />He appealed to all like-minded parties and those claiming to be pro-farmers and pro-land owners to oppose the BJP's Land Act, besides asking the ruling party in Tamil Nadu (AIADMK) to also oppose it in the Upper House.<br /><br />"AIADMK has the opportunity in the Rajya Sabha to demonstrate its support for farmers, farm labourers and land owners," by opposing the Bill, he said.<br /><br />With a 37-member strength in the Lok Sabha, AIADMK had backed the government on this matter, drawing strong response from opposition parties in the state including DMK and CPI(M).<br /><br />However, Jayalalithaa had stoutly defended her party's support, saying it was extended only after AIADMK's amendments were incorporated. <br /><br />Ramesh said there were provisions that a state government can 'improve on the legislation' if it wants to, the Modi government's law, however, set the framework for the entire country and it has demonstrated with the amendments that the ruling BJP at Centre was 'fundamentally anti-farmer'.<br /><br />"It is true that a state can pass its own land acquisition law which can improve on the central law. But the central law has its own importance. My question to AIADMK is if you want to pass a progressive law in Tamil Nadu it is fine, but why support a dictatorial law in Centre," he asked.<br /><br />Putting aside political differences, like-minded parties should stand by Congress in this matter as it was aimed at the welfare of the farmers, he said.<br /><br />Ramesh said the UPA's Land Acquisition Act was brought after proper discussions with states and other stakeholders in a 'democractic' way but the BJP had not done so and had adopted a 'dictatorial' method and 'pushed it in Lok Sabha' due to BJP's strong majority.<br /><br />While the UPA's 2013 Act was aimed at replacing the 1894 Act by enhancing compensation among others, the NDA government was bringing back the British era legislation, he charged.<br /><br />He opposed any attempts to 'dilute' the UPA's Land Act and vowed to oppose the Government inside and outside Parliament and take support of like-minded parties. <br /><br /></p>