“Muddai Sust, Gawah Chust” (the complainant is lazy, but the witness is active). This was how a special city court described the CBI for not being vigilant enough to ensure the disposal of a 37- year-old case, probably the oldest pending matter in the country.
The CBI’s decision of transferring a prosecutor from a court without posting another one in advance, drew the court’s ire which not only rebuked the agency but also imposed a cost of Rs 10,000 on its director of prosecution for delaying the criminal case.
The remarks were made by Special Judge Sanjay Kumar Aggarwal, who was hearing a case of theft of an antique idol from the ancient Takashakeshwar Mahadev temple in Allahabad in 1981 which was being reportedly smuggled to New York. The case is at the stage of final arguments.
The court said it was aware that it “cannot put its neck” into the administrative affairs of a department as the sole prerogative of the agency was to man its human resources.
It said the issue was not why a particular senior public prosecutor of this court was transferred when the hearing of this 37 years old case was in progress.
But the question is “why steps in anticipation were not taken by the director prosecution so that no inconvenience is caused to this court for effective disposal of this oldest case and the other old cases in which the hearing was in progress,” the court said.
