<p>Union Minister and former chief minister S M Krishna on Friday reiterated that the decision to de-reserve 11,620 sq km areas for mining by his government in 2003, was a policy decision and that there was nothing illegal about it.<br /><br /></p>.<p>When asked about the State government’s recent reply to the Central Empowered Committee of the Supreme Court, in which it was claimed that the de-reservation allowed public assets to be channelled to select private individuals/entities, he said: <br />“Hearing this question is like listening to the same old song. It was a decision taken by the cabinet and it was a policy decision.”<br /><br />The Committee has sought the State government’s comments on a petition which calls for a CBI probe against three former chief ministers, including Krishna, for their alleged role in illegal mining. <br /><br />In response, the ruling BJP, which had initially defended the de-reservations saying that it was taken as per the national mining policy, has now said that the decision was against public interest.<br />DH News Service</p>
<p>Union Minister and former chief minister S M Krishna on Friday reiterated that the decision to de-reserve 11,620 sq km areas for mining by his government in 2003, was a policy decision and that there was nothing illegal about it.<br /><br /></p>.<p>When asked about the State government’s recent reply to the Central Empowered Committee of the Supreme Court, in which it was claimed that the de-reservation allowed public assets to be channelled to select private individuals/entities, he said: <br />“Hearing this question is like listening to the same old song. It was a decision taken by the cabinet and it was a policy decision.”<br /><br />The Committee has sought the State government’s comments on a petition which calls for a CBI probe against three former chief ministers, including Krishna, for their alleged role in illegal mining. <br /><br />In response, the ruling BJP, which had initially defended the de-reservations saying that it was taken as per the national mining policy, has now said that the decision was against public interest.<br />DH News Service</p>