JOIN USThe Post tells of the tense days leading up to The Washington Post's decision in 1971 to publish the Pentagon Papers, the government's secret history of the Vietnam War. The New York Times had broken the story but was prohibited from running the full series after the Nixon administration won a court injunction. That's when The Post took up the story. Directed by Steven Spielberg, the film stars Meryl Streep as Katharine Graham, The Post's publisher, who came into her own by defying President Richard Nixon's order, and Tom Hanks as the
legendary editor Ben Bradlee. It is also the first time these three Hollywood icons have all worked together. I recently spoke with Hanks and Streep about the film's uncanny parallels with today, their thoughts on the Weinstein moment, and what it's like following in the footsteps of what is arguably the best newspaper movie ever, All the President's Men, starring
Jason Robards as Bradlee. Here are edited excerpts from their conversation:
Did either of you go in thinking, 'Well, the definitive 'Washington Post' movie was made. Are we up against that?'
STREEP: I didn't think the definitive Washington Post movie was made. It was a great movie, but it neglected to mention Katharine Graham, and her central
position. She was glancingly there.
HANKS: There was a reference to her.
(To Hanks) Especially you stepping into a role that was iconically done. How do you go about that differently?
HANKS: I viewed this as the story of the week that Katharine Graham became Katharine Graham. In which case I had the juicy aspect of playing the only ally she had. You know, philosophically, the relationship that they had was based on so much stuff. You might as well just call it love, respect, empathy, understanding, professional moxie.
STREEP: Mutual admiration.
HANKS: It's also cantankerous, like when he said, 'Katharine, get your finger out of my eye.' From the moment we both read it and said, 'Oh, I'm not going to let this pass me by,' it grew into the specifics of what the Pentagon Papers were. It actually bolstered the story of the week that Katharine Graham became Katharine Graham.
She was filled with such self-doubt. And it dogged her her whole life. She felt like she was in a holding pattern until her son came of age and became the publisher. Where do you think she found that mettle to say, 'Let's do it, let's publish'? Her advisers were against it.
STREEP: Where do the hardest things come from? They come from deep. Usually, they come from your parents. Her father was a formidable figure, and her mother was even more terrifyingly important in her life. Absent, but the absence was important. Katharine Graham was someone who was a product of her time. It was the whole culture that undermined all women, especially women that should've had the most agency of all - highly educated wealthy women who had every opportunity to step into important places in life but they sat back. The more I read about her, the more I thought, 'Who do you think you are trying to be - Katharine Graham?' She was so thoughtful, deep-principled and wily in that way that women had to be when they were only the second tier of a society.
HANKS: There was that moment where the men stayed and talked about policy and current events, and the women went in the other room.
The film is a model for men and women working together respectfully, which, who would have thunk it, is what we need, that good example.
STREEP: Yeah, but just think if I had been the managing editor of The Washington Post and you had been my publisher. If I said, 'Get your finger out of my eye.'
HANKS: You would've been a bitch.
STREEP: I would've been fired. And that's what I mean about the imbalance. There's a tolerance for a certain kind of thing. I think women also have to step up and get able to do that.
There are echoes of Nixon in what we're hearing now from the White House, with the difference being that the person in the White House is saying that real reporting is "fake news". Was it gratifying to do a movie set when people actually believed things?
HANKS: The assault on the First Amendment under the Nixon administration was old school, a D-Day version of 'Let's stop this story because it's national security and they're traitors if they print it. Because if they dare print it, they'll find out that we lied. And if they know that we're lying, we can't do our jobs.' What's happening now is this guerrilla war that is going on against the First Amendment. This idea now that has actually been verbalised by various people high up in the current administration, that there is such a thing as (an) 'alternative fact.' It gives validation to what is patently false, that the purveyors know is a lie, and worse, know that it is completely unconfirmed and is scurrilous. And in that realm comes some degree of the same message: 'Don't let them find out the truth, because if so we can't stay in power.' All of this stuff that was going on was not lost on any of us.
One thing that struck me after the Harvey Weinstein accusations broke was people were saying, 'What is Meryl going to say?' They were waiting for you.
STREEP: I know. I found out about this on a Friday and went home deep into my own life. And then somebody told me that on Morning Joe they were screaming that I haven't responded yet. I don't have a Twitter thing or - handle, whatever. And I don't have Facebook. I really had to think. Because it really underlined my own sense of cluelessness, and also how evil, deeply evil, and duplicitous, a person he was, yet such a champion of really great work. You make movies. You think you know everything about everybody. So much gossip. You don't know anything. People are so inscrutable on a certain level. And it's a shock. Some of my favourite people have been brought down by this, and he's not one of them.
What do you make of the fact, though, that people are waiting for you to speak?
STREEP: I don't want to hear about the silence of me. I want to hear about the silence of Melania Trump. I want to hear from her. She has so much that's valuable to say. And so does Ivanka. I want her to speak now.
(To Hanks) What do you make of this #MeToo moment?
HANKS: I know that I have participated in crude humour worthy of a baseball locker room on a set. And that's bad words, and a degree of stupid sexuality in the confines of the circus. I was asked by Diane Rehm on NPR if I had ever been aware of this type of sexual predatory behaviour. And I said: 'Well, it's easy to say no. I mean, I'm oblivious to an awful lot of this. But I'd be a fool to say that it's never happened on some job I've had, because I'm not in every office.' But four days after the Harvey Weinstein stuff broke someone wrote, 'Who says it's too late to learn new behaviour?' There's no reason not to view this as a reckoning that is going to make us a better society.
STREEP: There shouldn't be the idea of a locker room. The payload is unloaded on women, because that's the last group it's kind of OK to demean, degrade.
The New York Times